Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is a valid concern, and perhaps verifiable. How many Windows user actually create a non-admin account to use for their everyday work? I find, anecdotally, that a helluva lot of them don't; in fact, the very idea is foreign to them.
I'd argue this is largely a question of defaults and ergonomics. Most users will leave the default settings if they don't have an active need to change them. Easily usable (and understandable) tools and interfaces prevent most needs from arising in the first place. Concrete example: The root account on many Linux distros is disabled by default. I've never felt the need to enable it, because sudo does everything I nee…
Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
91–100 of 182 posts
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
But they are allowed to learn, which Apple doesn't want you to do. They could make it so your mom doesn't get root by accident, but you would still have the right to do so.
> They could make it so your mom doesn't get root by accident, but you would still have the right to do so. How? Serious, genuine question. How can they give you “the right to do so”, but prevent “mom” from accidentally doing so or worse, having someone do it to their phone without them knowing?
It could even be as involved as getting an official image from apple/google that allows root access. I don’t think a “mom” would accidentally download an image and flash their telephones.
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think Apple's approach is the only reasonable one for the general population. The technological complexity of any smartphone is far beyond comprehension for most people. I write iOS software for a living, and even with complete access to the source code, I couldn't reasonably evaluate my iPhone's software - let alone the hardware. The idea that ROMs from questionable sources make your device safer sounds very stran…
>The technological complexity of any smartphone is far beyond comprehension for most people. The exact same goes for regular computers and operating systems. And we still have those. Shouldn't we at least have the option on mobile?
You have computer form factors and OS'es invented in the 80's and 90s for desktop. The only reason they still work that way is because of legacy/inertia.
The exception is the ChromeBook and CromeOS and that works similar to a smartphone. For a reason.
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#94It's unfortunate how Apple and Google approach device ownership, and their attitude towards the concept of general computing is concerning. We do not control our own devices, we cannot stop certain processes on them, and we do not know where our personal data is sent. We either have to flash ROMs from questionable sources and apply temporary exploits to get some kind of resemblance of control of our own devices, or w…
It's a legitimate point to make, but it should rather be that we talk about the content of the article rather than bring out the 'Apple's taking our freedom away' soapbox.
It inevitably turns into a debate between one side who values personal freedoms but won't be told to buy Android phones widespread safety, security, and privacy and tell the others to just buy Android phones.
This goes around and around, usually getting nobody anywhere, and happens all over again the next time an article about iOS turns up on the front page.
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#95It's unfortunate how Apple and Google approach device ownership, and their attitude towards the concept of general computing is concerning. We do not control our own devices, we cannot stop certain processes on them, and we do not know where our personal data is sent. We either have to flash ROMs from questionable sources and apply temporary exploits to get some kind of resemblance of control of our own devices, or w…
You can get a developer account, build and sign your own executables, and run whatever you want on your iPhone. I don’t think those flashed ROMs give you appreciably more “control” over your iPhone than stock iOS provides, because actual control requires usable control surfaces . More likely, you are replacing the control surfaces provided by an accountable entity (Apple) who has prioritized your security and privacy…
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#96It's unfortunate how Apple and Google approach device ownership, and their attitude towards the concept of general computing is concerning. We do not control our own devices, we cannot stop certain processes on them, and we do not know where our personal data is sent. We either have to flash ROMs from questionable sources and apply temporary exploits to get some kind of resemblance of control of our own devices, or w…
You can get a developer account, build and sign your own executables, and run whatever you want on your iPhone. I don’t think those flashed ROMs give you appreciably more “control” over your iPhone than stock iOS provides, because actual control requires usable control surfaces . More likely, you are replacing the control surfaces provided by an accountable entity (Apple) who has prioritized your security and privacy…
That's what your comment boils down to. You really want to go down that road of an argument? On a website that has hacker culture in its very name?
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The technological complexity of any smartphone is far beyond comprehension for most people. The exact same goes for regular computers and operating systems. And we still have those. Shouldn't we at least have the option on mobile?
> And we still have those. You have computer form factors and OS'es invented in the 80's and 90s for desktop. The only reason they still work that way is because of legacy/inertia. The exception is the ChromeBook and CromeOS and that works similar to a smartphone. For a reason.
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#98It's unfortunate how Apple and Google approach device ownership, and their attitude towards the concept of general computing is concerning. We do not control our own devices, we cannot stop certain processes on them, and we do not know where our personal data is sent. We either have to flash ROMs from questionable sources and apply temporary exploits to get some kind of resemblance of control of our own devices, or w…
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#99It's unfortunate how Apple and Google approach device ownership, and their attitude towards the concept of general computing is concerning. We do not control our own devices, we cannot stop certain processes on them, and we do not know where our personal data is sent. We either have to flash ROMs from questionable sources and apply temporary exploits to get some kind of resemblance of control of our own devices, or w…
You can get a developer account, build and sign your own executables, and run whatever you want on your iPhone. I don’t think those flashed ROMs give you appreciably more “control” over your iPhone than stock iOS provides, because actual control requires usable control surfaces . More likely, you are replacing the control surfaces provided by an accountable entity (Apple) who has prioritized your security and privacy…
Sure, for an extra $100 every single year. Apple charging money for a feature does not protect users.
Re: Apple Accidentally Unpatches Vulnerability, Leading to New iOS 12.4 Jailbreak
#100The saddest thing about this is the article presents jailbreaking as an entirely negative thing, while the comments offer a more balanced opinion.