21–26 of 26 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Title is misleading As in most of the cases when AI is involved, and most of the cases when China is involved.
Let's develop a machine learning algorithm which can decide the likelihood of misleading title by checking what contexts are involved
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Before we have developed a machine learning algorithm which can decide what contexts are involved in a corpus by checking which words are included, and in what order and within what subcontext?
Maybe.
The "virtual AI judge" has a collection of 120 frequently asked questions. Based on keywords in user input, it picks one of the predetermined answers and uses speech synthesis to have an avatar read it out. So, a chat bot.
More useful is probably the "mobile court", which is supposed to enable filing a suit online and participating in hearings via video conference. The avatar is only a small part of that.
They've also opened a shop on Taobao, which seems absurd to me, but they seem to be very enthusiastic about it.
It’s not actually a judge. Title is misleading.
At the official website, they also refer to it as AI judge. Besides that, it is using facial recognition and voice recognition through WeChat running on mobile devices.
[flagged]