Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
english.bjinternetcourt.gov.cn
Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#2It’s not actually a judge. Title is misleading.
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#3Wow, clickbait on HN.
So basically the justice department is using 'AI' or rather Machine Learning/Classification powered tooling to aid in their work. Reminds me of the engineer who wrote a chatbot to handle claims on a parking fines in NewYork: https://qz.com/719888/an-ai-powered-chatbot-has-overturned-1...
Aka: "AI-Powered Robot-Lawyer now winning cases in New York City and London Metropole".
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#4the internet of wechat
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#5[flagged]
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#6[flagged]
heh, at least i have my idea for the slackjaw humor competition
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#7The title is missing the point..
It says "... to be used for the completion of “repetitive basic work” only..."
That is what most software automation attempts to do!
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#8It’s not actually a judge. Title is misleading.
At the official website, they also refer to it as AI judge.
Besides that, it is using facial recognition and voice recognition through WeChat running on mobile devices.
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#9the internet of wechat
Exactly. See you later open web.
Re: Beijing Internet Court launches online litigation service center
#10We in the west are already using this for bail decisionmaking - this one is used in the US.
https://www.equivant.com/northpointe-suite/
On another note, why is there always a push to "humanise" the system with some bullshit robot? It's completely unnecessary. What it boils down to is some weighted matrices doing mathematical work. I would argue that if it was used by a human judge to aid their judgement, mixed in with their prior experience. I would argue that in a lot of cases it is going to make them question their own biases if the system is designed to be race blind and only using the salient facts.