If not, then why not? :)
Ask HN: Would you pay for web browser?
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Ask HN: Would you pay for web browser?
#2Re: Ask HN: Would you pay for web browser?
#3Re: Ask HN: Would you pay for web browser?
#41. It could be bundled into my monthly internet bill
2. The fee was not more than 10 USD
3. The browser had actively developed ad blocking and
4. Nuisance blocking and
5. Tracking protection and
6. The browser used less memory than competitors
By nuisances I mean cookie notifications, subscription requests, anti-ad-blocking messages, etc. By actively developed I mean I get an update every month, and the developers are actively testing and researching the features. Strict standards compliance could take a back seat to these features, as long as it could adequately render a page. Features that might make up for one of the desiderata above would be
1. Media ripping (if this could be done in a way that would respect publisher rights) or
2. Macros, down to mouse movements and key presses