Earlier quoted context omitted.
Back in my senior year of high school during Spanish class I naively used NET SEND to send a message to one of my classmates. The only problem was that I failed to specify the user in the command and instead used *. This ended up sending a message to all computers in the school district. I remember the computer administrator coming into the class saying “Are you aware one of your students is sending messages to the e…
A classmate did the same, although the outcome was far worse. We studied at university in the medical faculty, which happened to be housed in the academic hospital. We found out the hard way that the network was not segregated, his netsend command crashed all the ICU terminals...
The Horror of Microsoft Teams
301–310 of 344 posts
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#302This thread should give some much needed perspective on all the people who assume MS is going to destroy slack. I bet slack destroys outlook before teams destroys slack.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think Teams is exactly excellent because it allows you to secure your collaboration tool. Especially valuable post GDPR where you really don’t want your non-tech savy employers putting privacy data into some online Trello board, or slack/discord for that matter. The fact that teams is just part of your 365 platform is soooo awesome in non-tech enterprise that it’s hard to describe just how useful it is. But basical…
"I love how integrated it is but I had to write code to remove the integration that was counterproductive" I get it, but it seems contradictory, and your workaround is probably beyond reach for many smaller businesses.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#304It compares with the competition really well on paper, but the details suck the life out of you.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m curious what was so great about it: when we did the comparison even the Atlassian maintainers picked Slack.
It was a focused product. Native apps, high performance, no funny business. Yes, it lacked some features that the newer stuff had, but it did the team chat part really well and got out of your way. Deploying web apps lets you iterate faster, stuff features in faster without ending up with different capabilities across the group of apps. Sometimes the ability to add features too easily is abused to add too many featur…
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#306> "This means that if someone does @${channel_name} you will get an alert. MS have not implemented muting as a feature. Secondly, for all those automatic/admin channels, you can’t unsubscribe yourself (or at least not with the default policies). Brilliant, isn’t it? Unavoidable alerts that any idiot on any channel can annoy people with." At my last job we figured out the fastest way to get your company off Teams: add…
Our CEO gave up on slack long ago. Email is the best way to get their attention.
You write it, think about it send it.
In a chat you just type and send as you think and decoding that stuff in hindsight is more work.
I’d rather get one focused and well thought out mail than 20.messages of which a quarter shouldn’t even bother me.
There is no real reason why you couldn’t write Slack messages as well composed as an email. But nearly nobody does.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That being said, the Teams UX will slowly and steadily improve You think that they people who brought us "The Word Ribbon" and Metro UI are going to make things better? That's not how M$FT rolls. Their customer base is deathly allergic to change. They lose their minds if things change perceptibly from what they looked like when they bought the system.
I don't know. The word ribbon was miserable to begin with but it has reached a point, thanks to a bunch of UI improvements, where it's far preferable to the classic menu for many people (at least the majority of people I've met). The word ribbon is definitely an example to follow. Metro isn't, because , wtf. They can't make up their mind.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#308> "This means that if someone does @${channel_name} you will get an alert. MS have not implemented muting as a feature. Secondly, for all those automatic/admin channels, you can’t unsubscribe yourself (or at least not with the default policies). Brilliant, isn’t it? Unavoidable alerts that any idiot on any channel can annoy people with." At my last job we figured out the fastest way to get your company off Teams: add…
Reminds me of the NET SEND command in windows 2000-xp. Allowed sending a popup text message to specific (or all with a wildcard!) machines on a network. Sure there were times where such a feature would be convenient ("server going down for maintenance, please save your work", etc), but overall ripe for abuse. They disabled it in a service pack and took it out altogether in subsequent versions.
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#309Disclosure: Microsoft employee. Using a throwaway. Satya, please don't track me down and fire me. I've never agreed so heavily with a headline and disagreed so vehemently with the actual content. Some of this is right, but a big chunk is wrong and I think misses some of the most egregious horrors of Teams. I used Slack professionally before in a fairly large org (>200). Two things the author got wrong: First - things…
[0] https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/su...
Re: The Horror of Microsoft Teams
#310[0] https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/su...