Live data from Hacker News

I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

bloomberg.com

11–20 of 97 posts

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s on a raspberry pi that is connected to your LAN. It is dns for the LAN and blocks any requests to hosts that are blacklisted

How does this differ from the traditional hosts file that blocks requests to blacklisted hosts?

Works for devices with hard to access hosts files (IoT garbage, smart TVs)

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#12
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s on a raspberry pi that is connected to your LAN. It is dns for the LAN and blocks any requests to hosts that are blacklisted

I presume it doesn’t need to be a Raspberry Pi, it could be any host in your LAN?

Yes, it can run on any host in your lan.

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s on a raspberry pi that is connected to your LAN. It is dns for the LAN and blocks any requests to hosts that are blacklisted

How does this differ from the traditional hosts file that blocks requests to blacklisted hosts?

My understanding is that it accomplishes the same thing but for every device on your network rather than having to manage host files on each device. It also works for those where editing the host file isn't possible.

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s on a raspberry pi that is connected to your LAN. It is dns for the LAN and blocks any requests to hosts that are blacklisted

How does this differ from the traditional hosts file that blocks requests to blacklisted hosts?

Not much, except it's on another machine and is a central point of config. Can even be used to hand out DHCP

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#15

Since this was about devices and ad-blocking, I expected the Pi-hole to make an appearance. But alas, the author used Brave browser. https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/blob/master/README.md

Not only did he not mention PiHole (or the similar, but better, Adguard Home), he didn't seem to be aware that network adblocking is a thing—but who can blame him? It's not exactly trivial unless you're comfortable with a terminal. Is there any sort of commercialized solution for this? I'd love to see Adguard/Pihole devices available off the shelf; with a little marketing I think they could really appeal to a lot of people.

(I looked around and the only 'built in' solution I could find for adblocking is in Eero WiFi's paid subscription, which blocks ads on their wifi router)

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Brave works. Lots of propaganda on here against Brave for some reason. It's open source based on chromium with all the Google bits taken out, and it has built in ad blocking. So there's an opt-in crypto coin, so what.

If I could have one thing in Brave, aside from bug fixes, it’s this: rather than give me popup ads on my desktop, replace some of the static ads it blocks with Brave ones. They’re way less intrusive.

Then I would have to look for a solution for the sites I run that completely block Brave. I don't care if people block ads. But I give a massive fuck if someone/thing swapped out my ads for theirs.

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#17
post #15

Since this was about devices and ad-blocking, I expected the Pi-hole to make an appearance. But alas, the author used Brave browser. https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/blob/master/README.md

Not only did he not mention PiHole (or the similar, but better, Adguard Home), he didn't seem to be aware that network adblocking is a thing—but who can blame him? It's not exactly trivial unless you're comfortable with a terminal. Is there any sort of commercialized solution for this? I'd love to see Adguard/Pihole devices available off the shelf; with a little marketing I think they could really appeal to a lot of…

Adguard can be used with any router: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html#instruction

Its not built in per se, but its arguably less complicated than replacing a router (or worse, putting one router behind another, as would be required for the many people who's cable/fiber/etc modem is all in one with their router).

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#18

Since this was about devices and ad-blocking, I expected the Pi-hole to make an appearance. But alas, the author used Brave browser. https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/blob/master/README.md

Brave works. Lots of propaganda on here against Brave for some reason. It's open source based on chromium with all the Google bits taken out, and it has built in ad blocking. So there's an opt-in crypto coin, so what.

> Lots of propaganda on here against Brave for some reason.

I think the same reason some people find Google's advertising-based business model problematic, they find Brave's advertising-based business model problematic.

Re: I Tried Hiding from Big Tech in a Pile of Privacy Gadgets

#20

While activities like this may result in the author being less visible to a particular algorithm, I imagine that the instant dropoff from most networks and instant arrival in new networks would be a very strong signal of who they are. The more bizarre tricks you try to stay hidden, the more identifiable you (probably) are.

But if you can get hundreds or thousands of people to use the same tricks as you, then you may be able to blend in with that group.

It's like the scenarios that weren't explored in the https://xkcd.com/1105/ strip: yeah, if it's just one guy with the 1lIl11l license plate, it might attract police attention, but if the guy collaborated with ten others who got similar license plates for similar-looking cars, then that could work to confuse and divert the police.

Post reply on HN