Live data from Hacker News

The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

cnn.com

21–30 of 88 posts

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#21

RIP Zuckbucks ️ This removes a huge part of the mainstream rationale for digital alternative currencies.

Maybe in the United States, but I would still wager there would be interest for a Facebook's digital currency in countries with more volatile, native currencies.

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#22
post #7
post #2

Some real-time payment infrastructures to compare to: UK - Faster Payments Service (2008) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster_Payments_Service EU - SEPA Instant Credit (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Euro_Payments_Area#SEPA... Australia - New Payments Platform (2018) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Payments_Platform

NPP has been hugely beneficial for p2p. I've used it and now trust it implicitly, as a mechanism. Being stuck in cheque clearing bank settlement delay is a royal pain. International funds clearance and KYC remain problems.

NPP is on it's way to being really handy, but it still sucks that I have to hack things to force NPP for some payments

(ie. CommBank will only use NPP for PayID payments, but banks like Up will use NPP for transfers for a BSB/Account number if the receiving banks supports it, not all banks are fully on the platform yet)

The downside is my teenagers can now shake me down for cash remotely

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#25

RIP Zuckbucks ️ This removes a huge part of the mainstream rationale for digital alternative currencies.

My guess is Libra (and everything else going on in the crypto world) will have 5 years before FedNow is out. A lot can happen in that time.

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#26
post #20

I expect banks to start charging a $65 per transaction premium to interface with this system. FedACH, or "direct deposit", costs pennies wholesale [0]. The value proposition of Venmo/Zelle is not just that they're instant, but that the fees are not insane. Compare that to retail banks which charge upwards of $35 for a "next-day ACH". The Fed should impose fee caps to encourage adoption. [0] https://www.frbservices.or…

> Compare that to retail banks which charge upwards of $35 for a "next-day ACH". Is that still common? None of my banks / credit unions charges for incoming or outgoing ACH transfers.

Sadly, yes, for outgoing through Bank of America.

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#27
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NPP has been hugely beneficial for p2p. I've used it and now trust it implicitly, as a mechanism. Being stuck in cheque clearing bank settlement delay is a royal pain. International funds clearance and KYC remain problems.

NPP is on it's way to being really handy, but it still sucks that I have to hack things to force NPP for some payments (ie. CommBank will only use NPP for PayID payments, but banks like Up will use NPP for transfers for a BSB/Account number if the receiving banks supports it, not all banks are fully on the platform yet) The downside is my teenagers can now shake me down for cash remotely

NPP is a joke. There's a limit of $1,000 for transfers. It doesn't always work if you don't use a PayID.

Compare that to Faster Payments which easily works with 250k with or without a PayID

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#28
post #7
post #2

Some real-time payment infrastructures to compare to: UK - Faster Payments Service (2008) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster_Payments_Service EU - SEPA Instant Credit (2017) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Euro_Payments_Area#SEPA... Australia - New Payments Platform (2018) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Payments_Platform

NPP has been hugely beneficial for p2p. I've used it and now trust it implicitly, as a mechanism. Being stuck in cheque clearing bank settlement delay is a royal pain. International funds clearance and KYC remain problems.

[deleted]

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#29
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NPP is on it's way to being really handy, but it still sucks that I have to hack things to force NPP for some payments (ie. CommBank will only use NPP for PayID payments, but banks like Up will use NPP for transfers for a BSB/Account number if the receiving banks supports it, not all banks are fully on the platform yet) The downside is my teenagers can now shake me down for cash remotely

NPP is a joke. There's a limit of $1,000 for transfers. It doesn't always work if you don't use a PayID. Compare that to Faster Payments which easily works with 250k with or without a PayID

That transaction limit is only a bank imposed limitation - while out of the ones I checked, Commonwealth (and I assume some other) does have a $1K daily limit for personal accounts, various other banks appear to have higher limits or just use the regular transaction limit (which you can usually choose yourself).

Re: The Fed is getting into the Real-Time payments business

#30

I expect banks to start charging a $65 per transaction premium to interface with this system. FedACH, or "direct deposit", costs pennies wholesale [0]. The value proposition of Venmo/Zelle is not just that they're instant, but that the fees are not insane. Compare that to retail banks which charge upwards of $35 for a "next-day ACH". The Fed should impose fee caps to encourage adoption. [0] https://www.frbservices.or…

Venmo is free for non-commercial uses and there are weekly or monthly limits.

If you want to accept venmo for commercial purposes or more cash than is usually allowed, they charge you as if it were a credit card transaction. 2.9% + 0.30.

Also, PayPal owns venmo now.

Post reply on HN