Earlier quoted context omitted.
I honestly would expect that at a national park. To me that would be what a national park ... just is.
But this is the place where you might get lost and without cell service, you are really lost. This is quite annoying in the US, that national parks or deserts have no cell service. The places that need it most (life and death situations) - this is basically a health service there. In comparison to Europe the mobile density is quite sparse there.
Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
101–110 of 343 posts
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I honestly would expect that at a national park. To me that would be what a national park ... just is.
But this is the place where you might get lost and without cell service, you are really lost. This is quite annoying in the US, that national parks or deserts have no cell service. The places that need it most (life and death situations) - this is basically a health service there. In comparison to Europe the mobile density is quite sparse there.
You're endangering yourself which I wouldn't care that much about but you're also potentially endangering any search and rescue teams that have to come looking for you.
As for the lost scenario specifically. I don't know. Maybe carry a (paper) map and compass? In addition (not instead of) a GPS doesn't need cell reception to operate and works most places. (Some exceptions, like narrow canyons.)
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#103I can't say that I'm impressed, but having just lived in Canada which is _far_ worse I'm happy about it not being quite as bad.
However, 10 years ago in Sweden I had an unmetered 1000/1000mbps fiber connection for 4Eur/m. I feel like I'm doomed to forever have a shittier connection.
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
But this is the place where you might get lost and without cell service, you are really lost. This is quite annoying in the US, that national parks or deserts have no cell service. The places that need it most (life and death situations) - this is basically a health service there. In comparison to Europe the mobile density is quite sparse there.
There’s a reason it’s called wilderness. One should have basic orienteering skills if they venture away from the popular, touristy locations. If things really do go awry, bring (and use) an EPIRB. I would never rely on a cellular phone for safety in the wilderness. Cellular service and geolocation was never be 100% reliable, and batteries die. A paper map, a compass, basic skills, and knowledge of one’s limits go a l…
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#105Just a bit more background from Germany: This article largely focusses on broadband connections. It doesn't even begin to adress the even bigger issue, which is that mobile internet is extremely bad compared to most other european countries. Also interesting that even the reporter fell for one of the lamest excuses: "Among them are the country’s large geographic area". Northern neighbor Sweden, which happens to be on…
For example, I pay 35€ for 16GB LTE.
Also, while the Vodafone net is rather good, I read they are replacing their 3G with 4G, which means stuff gets faster, but only for people with newer phones.
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having recently visited the Yellowstone National Park, the situation you describe for the North Sea side of Germany applies but worse, the cell phone data connection being non-existent, and with the added issue that only one hotel offered wifi, and it was out of service for the entire duration of our visit.
It's a national park - this is an intentional policy. There is some cell service, but the park specifically does not want cell towers everywhere. > In 2009, Yellowstone completed a plan for wireless communications in the park. The plan dictates that cell phone and wifi will only be allowed for visitor safety and to enhance park operations. It restricts towers, antennas, and wireless services to a few limited location…
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Home internet regularly costs $80 in the US, or roughly €72. €40 seems pretty reasonable by comparison.
Really? $80? I haven't seen $80 for internet. In a suburban area outside of Tacoma ~300mbps was about $50, and now just outside of Seattle I pay $75 for 1 gbps . The non-gigabit plans were south of $50. I Googled a bit and most websites said Americans generally pay somewhere between $50-$60.
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#108Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#109I mean, almost every country should. I live in Russia and it baffles me how much faster and cheaper internet is here, compared to the most western countries.
Re: Germans Grow Frustrated with Their Slow-Poke Internet
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's far cheaper than the US. I get 6MB/s downloads for 15€/month. For mobile, there's a chart making the rounds on Twitter, and it seems to me Germany is very much in line with other countries. Of course it's more expensive than it is in poorer countries in eastern Europe, as everything is.
For a while in Germany I was paying 30€/month for 10Mbps. Meanwhile other EU countries gave you 1Gbps for ~10€/month. Germany is definitely at the lower end of internet infrastructure.