Live data from Hacker News

The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

geneticsofdesign.com

11–20 of 66 posts

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#11
> It’s equally instructive to see how the older parts of the Seaport (above) original 19th-C commercial buildings on Seaport Boulevard, for instance, fit well within the city.

Cherry picking. The sample images are misleading at best. First one is mainly three buildings with quite some space around like sky and ground, even more buildings in the back. Second one is basically only the facade of one building. Sure there is a car, a bit of street and even some sky. But really there is not much else to look at.

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#15

Somehow there seems to be an application for military use here. Make a shiny tank and the enemy just won't be able to see it. Or does the shiny magic only work on civilian buildings?

It's been done with airplanes already. Some spy planes were shiny to be less visible in low overflight during the day. That also confuses simple optical sensors.

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#16

Somehow there seems to be an application for military use here. Make a shiny tank and the enemy just won't be able to see it. Or does the shiny magic only work on civilian buildings?

Dazzle camouflage[0] was used extensively in WWI to make it difficult to see ships because they were so brightly coloured. It's not quite the same principle, but it comes close.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#17

Somehow there seems to be an application for military use here. Make a shiny tank and the enemy just won't be able to see it. Or does the shiny magic only work on civilian buildings?

Dazzle camouflage[0] was used extensively in WWI to make it difficult to see ships because they were so brightly coloured. It's not quite the same principle, but it comes close. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage

The ships were easy to see. What was hard is determining what side you were looking at and what direction they were moving. This made it more difficult to engage them.

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#18
post #8
post #2

Isn't it simply brain looking at the edges of things? If a building doesn't have edges inside it then we look at its silhouette.

The author shows how for more classical buildings with more structure, the eye focus on the structural aspects of the buildings.

No, the author shows that some random computer vision tool focuses on more structural aspects of the buildings. Assuming that is related at all to what "the eye" does is ridiculous.

Re: The brain avoids looking at glassy skyscrapers

#20
This resonates with some of my experiences.

When I had a corporate job, I worked in a large glassy building that wasn't a skyscraper. It was initially one story -- though tall for just one story because it was industrial scale and held more than a thousand employees (about two thousand, at least after the addition).

The one story building reflected the sea of blacktop parking lots around it and appeared ominously black.

They added a two-story addition to one end and moved my department there. It became clearer that the building appeared to be ominously black because of what it reflected. The taller part reflected the sky while its base still seemed ominously black.

It became even clearer that this was so when they built a three-story building next door to house the IT department. That building mostly looked like floating clouds and blue sky. Very little of it seemed visually heavy and ominously dark.

But they were equally hard to mentally process. It was hard to comprehend these buildings whose appearance morphed based on what was being reflected. It was hard to figure out where they began and ended, what they were made of, etc.

It was not only disorienting, it was disturbing. It was a bit like working in a fun house mirror.

Post reply on HN