Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! The problem though is that if I post frequently, it would be very useful to know that what I am posting is a repost. Do you think this is a feature that could be implemented?
If the URL is the same, no new submission is created, but you're redirected to the former submission (and that gets an upvote, I think). Every now and then you also get "This story has been previously submitted". No idea when exactly, but it seems to be a newer development. This is not foolproof, of course, many articles are reachable from many URLs, especially if some social media tracking thing is embedded.
Zibaldone, the 14th Century’s Answer to Tumblr (2016)
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Zibaldone, the 14th Century’s Answer to Tumblr (2016)
#12Discussed at the time (in 2016, not the 14th century): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12405810
Interestingly it’s “the 13th Century” there (and in the url). Probably atlasobscura silently changed(/fixed?) it: https://web.archive.org/web/20160830171522/https://www.atlas... vs https://web.archive.org/web/20160901120029/https://www.atlas...
Re: Zibaldone, the 14th Century’s Answer to Tumblr (2016)
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it's in the FAQ: If a story has had significant attention in the last year or so, we kill reposts as duplicates. If not, a small number of reposts is ok. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
Thanks! The problem though is that if I post frequently, it would be very useful to know that what I am posting is a repost. Do you think this is a feature that could be implemented?
Re: Zibaldone, the 14th Century’s Answer to Tumblr (2016)
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! The problem though is that if I post frequently, it would be very useful to know that what I am posting is a repost. Do you think this is a feature that could be implemented?
We could match on exact URL but that would only catch some of the reposts. After that, it gets hard very quickly. It's best to got to HN search and plug in some keywords to see if the topic has had major attention before. You can use "comments>N" to get threads that had at least N comments, and similarly "points>N".
This is super useful. Thanks!