Live data from Hacker News

DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

prnewswire.com

151–160 of 172 posts

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#151
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The entire point of the tipping system is to have a high variance. The promise, but not guarantee, of tips is what is supposed to incentivize better service.

But in the case of the DoorDash, if you tip using the app, you tip long before you know what the service will be. It's like walking blindfolded into a restaurant and putting your tip in the hostesses hand before you even see any of the staff, or have any indication of service.

I see, I've never used DoorDash and assumed it was like Uber and UberEats where you tip afterwards.

That's a pretty silly system.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Ghost kitchens are mostly scams. They are not. They are just a different model than a standard restaurant. What I have observed in my area (UK) is that instead of expanding by setting up a new branch in the costly centre of town, some chains work with Deliveroo to open a ghost kitchen in the industrial area. That allows them to expand to a new town while saving on capex.

> They are not. They are just a different model than a standard restaurant. They are not. It is called commissary kitchen. Has been around forever. Those are the kitchens that support food trucks. Or the kitchens that support prepared food not made on premises in supermarkets. They don't work for a-la minute production even if a-la minute is just used to load it into driver's gear. > What I have observed in my area (…

A standard restaurant must be located where people will walk in. It must be pleasant premises for customers.

If the target is to work only with Deliveroo or other delivery app then everything can be stripped apart from the kitchen and that kitchen can then be located where it's cheapest since no customers will ever walk in or even know where it is.

That's not a scam. That's an adaptation, an optimisation for a specific business model.

> That simply means real estate has not adjusted to it. It will.

Premium retail space is going to cost more than industrial space that may be located anywhere in a much wider area.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally: having learned of their scummy practices, I will not be supporting DoorDash or Instacart ever again, regardless of whether they change policy now in response to being exposed. Why so unforgiving? Because you can't deter unethical behavior by merely asking for a perpetrator to discontinue the unethical behavior if/when exposed. The expected value of a penalty needs to exceed the financial reward of the beh…

By their scummy practices, are you referring to their tipping policy? I'm not sure I fully understand the backlash. Yes, the tipping policy didn't meet people's expectations ... but it seems almost exactly the same s how tipping + wages work for wait staff in restaurants (where restaurants are allowed to pay them less than minimum wage, as long as the difference is offset by tips). Why are we okay with this policy, w…

> Why are we okay with this policy, which is enshrined in law, for restaurant wait staff but not for delivery drivers?

Personally, I am not okay with the law. An employer should pay a living wage. That said, I'm biased because I would vastly prefer to avoid the anxiety I feel around figuring out the right amount to tip such that I don't feel scummy nor taken advantage of. I went there to eat some food, not feel anxious.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#154

For what it's worth, the general vibe I've gotten from couriers has been that Caviar is one of the best food delivery apps for them, and that DoorDash is among the worst.

As a customer, I’ve quit Doordash. They used to have decent customer service, where, although your order was screwed up, they’d generally fix it. They had a weird habit of always offering a $5 credit though, sometimes even when the part of the order that was screwed up cost more. But you could reach a real person pretty easily.

A lot has changed since then, and we’ve had several pretty negative encounters with them including one where the CS rep basically accused us of lying about not receiving our food. (I suspect it was misdelivered because the map software they used put our address as our neighbors house two doors down.)

My last experience with them: The app told us to contact them for an ETA on our food. The actual status of our order wasn’t clear. We had a dasher and then we didn’t have a dasher. There was no way to contact them. We tried “Contact the dasher” and the number didn’t go through. We tried to use the chat functionality (which is ridiculously buried under four or five levels of clicks and even then not immediately obvious” when it used to be basically automatic if you clicked “help”) and it wouldn’t connect us. We tried another number which also didn’t go through. The website had a message about difficulty placing orders at that time but ours was already placed.

So there we sat in limbo not knowing if the food would ever arrive and no way to contact anybody. Should we just go out to eat? We didn’t know. We did use their web form contact them, but the response came way too late to not have ruined our meal time. Eventually our order was cancelled and to their credit they gave us $50 credits but meh.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#155
Everyone's seemed to gloss over this but this deal seems to be as much an acqhuisition as an acquisition. Do some research on who Gokul Rajaram is. He ran ads at FB and Google was a very significant leader. I don't think the margins of food delivery have changed. Remember Square couldn't get Uber to pick up Caviar for $100 million around the time Square had its IPO. Also I imagine the price involves DoorDash seems to be banking on a closer relationship with Square as well.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ghost kitchens may be scams but I know at least of one QSR in Manhattan that does them successfully. In some instances they are quite profitable if you generate the volume. Your commission is also a bit off, perhaps you speak from full service experience? While true that base comm is 20-30, those numbers are always negotiated down. Grub/Seamless will take as low as 12 from high vol regional leaders while UberEats mad…

> Ghost kitchens may be scams but I know at least of one QSR in Manhattan that does them successfully. In some instances they are quite profitable if you generate the volume. It is a temporary fluke. If Chinese take out operators that are able to do razor thin margins and nearly completely unpaid labor force cannot make them work then no one can make them work > While true that base comm is 20-30, those numbers are a…

> It is a temporary fluke. If Chinese take out operators that are able to do razor thin margins and nearly completely unpaid labor force cannot make them work then no one can make them work

They can, and they do. One way some chains achieve this is by raising prices vs. in-store. By offsetting the cost, the economics makes more sense.

> It is a creative lie by omission. Same kind of lie that Grubhub had when it forgot about the $$ it charged restaurants for answering phones that Grubhub setup.

> There are maybe a dozen chains (McDonalds/Burger King/Chipotle/Qdoba/Subway/White Castle, etc) that can negotiate $1 fee. Your pizza place, your taco place, your take out sushi joint don't have this ability. If they did then the VCs would not fund DoorDash or GrubHub.

I personally know of chains that have less than 50 locations and have negotiated ~12-15% comm. I also know of a NYC deli with one location that runs at ~15-17 comm. Its about volume. You can negotiate anything with high enough vol.

Not sure what you meant by "creative lie by omission" or if you were referring to what I said.

> Have you heard of Shake Shack?

Shake Shack IPO'd in 2015. White Myers does sit on the board (chairman), they are different companies. Also, Shake Shack has only recently started going into delivery (check their latest 10-K) they are fledglings going from their own platform (OLO) to working w/Caviar/Dash/etc.

Again, successful, but not a barometer.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#157
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in a building that has a confusing relationship with it's name vs. the street its on. Uber (and Uber Eats) has never worked for me properly, and I always have to meet the courier at the door. Caviar always delivers directly to my door.

I hear you. It was so difficult for couriers to deliver where I live that I literally developed a single page website with pics and instructions. Now I just text them the url and access code.

I had to provide detailed instructions as well, and as soon as I did I never had another problem. But I don’t know why. My house isn’t hard to find at all. I even asked around and all my friends thought it was bizarre. (I moved here about five years ago so at the time ‘the first time’ was fresh in minds). I suspect they were relying on the map instead of address numbers because their map used to be off by two houses.

I also once opened the door after waiting about five minutes after getting the “driver is approaching” notification to hear two people bitching about “how ridiculous” it was finding my place. They were in my driveway but could not find the front door. My house is on a hill so the door is down a flight of stairs from the garage but it’s only about 20 feet away and plainly visible from the street.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They are not. They are just a different model than a standard restaurant. They are not. It is called commissary kitchen. Has been around forever. Those are the kitchens that support food trucks. Or the kitchens that support prepared food not made on premises in supermarkets. They don't work for a-la minute production even if a-la minute is just used to load it into driver's gear. > What I have observed in my area (…

A standard restaurant must be located where people will walk in. It must be pleasant premises for customers. If the target is to work only with Deliveroo or other delivery app then everything can be stripped apart from the kitchen and that kitchen can then be located where it's cheapest since no customers will ever walk in or even know where it is. That's not a scam. That's an adaptation, an optimisation for a specif…

That's how people who do not understand restaurant industry think of it. It is wrong.

Restaurant wants to minimize dwell time, which is a time that the restaurant does not spend cooking food for a-la minute order. The closer the restaurant is to the customer, the smaller is the dwell time if the customer is always available. That's the reason why the restaurant wants to be where the customers are.

Delivery-only restaurants dwell time is always larger than the walk in restaurant unless the delivery drivers are immediately and always available when the food is cooked and the time to deliver the food to the customer is the same as time time to turn it over across the counter ( for the same type of food ) which means the restaurant will always make less money in the identical situations.

The only thing that the restaurant gets from the delivery only portion is marketing when its menu is available to people who do not know about it. And it competes with every single other restaurant available in the delivery order. All that for the 20-30% discount off every order. That's the math. It is groupon, all over again. And the arguments of those in awe of the business model are exactly the same. It does not work because the best slammed take out places have 20-30% operating margins.

Finally, there's a startup called Crave which is going to kill this entire DoorDash/Delivery/Deliveroo type model - it gives restaurants ability to dynamically price their checks via discounts ( think surge pricing backwards ) for a low, flat per sale price. Think of it as Yelp Cash, but more dynamic and less connected to Yelp.

This actually solves the problem of dwell time. By offering a dynamic discount based on how busy the place is the restaurant increases a flow of orders into the business.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally: having learned of their scummy practices, I will not be supporting DoorDash or Instacart ever again, regardless of whether they change policy now in response to being exposed. Why so unforgiving? Because you can't deter unethical behavior by merely asking for a perpetrator to discontinue the unethical behavior if/when exposed. The expected value of a penalty needs to exceed the financial reward of the beh…

By their scummy practices, are you referring to their tipping policy? I'm not sure I fully understand the backlash. Yes, the tipping policy didn't meet people's expectations ... but it seems almost exactly the same s how tipping + wages work for wait staff in restaurants (where restaurants are allowed to pay them less than minimum wage, as long as the difference is offset by tips). Why are we okay with this policy, w…

Firstly, restaurants are not allowed to pay "less than minimum wage" in any US state, though some states have two separate minimum wage rates for tipped and untipped employees. (NB: all west coast states in the US have just one minimum wage that applies for all employees, tipped or not.)

But more fundamentally Instacart and Doordash deceived consumers in a way restaurants don't. Say minimum wage for tipped employees is $4, a restaurant pays a $5 wage and I tip $2, I expect that the staff gets the $5 wage and the $2 tip (whether pooled or otherwise). If the restauranteur uses my $2 tip to cut wages below $5, then that would be illegal and outrageous. The minimum wage amount of $4 does not even enter into the calculation in this example, except defining the floor for the restaurant to pay its tipped employees.

Re: DoorDash Buying Caviar from Square for $410M

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you suggesting that something changed to make this different? If so, what?

Smart phones (the associated app ecosystem, constant IP connectivity, GPS, and stored payment methods) and better computer mapping/route planning systems being ubiquitous. I remember around 2000 in order to order ice cream for delivery having to call Kozmo (or maybe it was Webvan) on a voice phone and talk to a person like some kind of savage. It seems like the smartphone and good map data could transform something t…

> call Kozmo

Yes, those were the purple shirts! Thank you for reminding me the name.

The thing is delivery is not an issue. In the markets that have density, local places figured out delivery. My bodega will deliver whatever I order. For free. So will four other bodegas in the immediate area. The guy who owns the wine store will deliver for free. So will the taco joint. Or PR chicken shack It will be done by the kids of people who own those places. Or by their relatives. Or by their helpers. Yes, all of them would also try UberEats and Grubhub and Seamless and others. All of them will drop those services after a few month ( all of them did ) because they are in a real cut throat market and they know what starts costing them money.

So we get to the areas with less density, which is the burbs and near rural. Such as, say, Bucks County in PA within a 20 minute drive of Doylestown. There are probably about 100 places total to get food from, including Wawa, take out places, casual restaurants and "upscale" sit down places. The issue there is that general delivery is not profitable, which is why none of the places deliver outside 5-10 minute drive. Their customers have cars and driving 10-20 minutes is not a big deal for a customer. The max time they are willing to wait for food is cook time + round trip time. Delivery services can't compete there because they can't beat the cooktime + roundtrip time ~ delivery is free option

Post reply on HN