Live data from Hacker News

Review of the 11" MacBook Air

mattgemmell.com

31–40 of 84 posts

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#31

I got the 11" and it does Starcraft on medium settings better than my wine session on a quad core 8800GTS does. Boot time of 16sec is also kind of a moot point... it drops in and out of sleep so effortlessly I doubt I'll ever need to reboot the thing.

Indeed. This has been the case with all my recent macs, actually. Why reboot (or shut down) if you can always just put it to sleep quickly.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#32
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Curious - how does background GC eliminate the need for TRIM? I know it can use a set of unallocated blocks and clean them and swap them in and out where necessary - but without knowledge of the filesystem structure itself (TRIM) - it's always going to be sub-optimal. You'll have some fast write-space available, but not necessarily the full amount you could.

My understanding is that OS X/HFS+ already optimizes for reusing already allocated blocks. This means that fast write-space is conserved as much as possible at the expense of larger commit-loads from the OS's RAM cache when writing to already allocated blocks. Also, what I've read seems to indicate that OS X behaves sub-optimally, but this is still good enough to support snappy behavior under normal workloads.

Not sure I follow.... the fast-write space in a non-TRIM device with GC is just some "extra" blocks (or whatever) that are kept aside and now and then swapped out for other in-use blocks (as far as the drive firmware is concerned - the OS has no idea this is going on) - and then the spare blocks are wiped for fast write again, then used when writes are requested.

Really appreciate if you could shed any more light on why OSX would be better at this.. not sure I can picture this.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#33
post #18
post #6

Two things that really bug me: 1. No cleartype. I.e. although there is subpixel antialiasing, fonts aren't optimized for the pixel grid. Thus, the fonts are much clearer when I boot to Windows and so I feel like everything is fuzzy when I boot back to Mac OS. This isn't a problem for the web, but for coding and SSH it's terrible. I can't use Windows full time though because Spaces is so outstanding and I don't get tr…

The first point is a longstanding difference of opinion between different users. The thing is, fonts on Windows in general are sharper but mangle the letterforms, while fonts on the Mac look just how they were designed but have to sacrifice sharpness to do so with current display resolutions. So, basically, the question is: Is readability more a function of the font's design or contrast of the luminance?

Not sure if they're "sharper". They're definitely thinner. OSX essentially increases boldness when they AA, while Windows decreases.

I, personally, vastly prefer OSX's rendering. But it's entirely a preference thing for nearly everyone (unless they're doing typographical work).

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#34
post #4

i've been using an 11" air as my only development machine for a month or two. a few minor things worth mentioning: - no backlit keyboard - no IR interface, so no ability to use a non-bluetooth remote control - the LCD screen is glossy, but it's just a film over the screen, not a glass/plastic sheet over the entire display. as a result, the glare isn't as bad as the macbook pro. - because the display is very thin, the…

oh, and the 11" has no sd card slot. i didn't really notice until i got mine that only the 13" air has it.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#35

I killed my MacBook Air envy by buying a Core i5 MBP, replacing the optical drive with a 128 GB SSD, installing the system and applications to the SSD and symlinking everything big and rarely accessed (iPhoto library, movies, iTunes U, etc) to the HDD. I have AppleScripts that mount/unmount the rotational drive when needed, and my machine now screams . It's heavier, sure, but I don't travel much and I love having all…

+1. I put a 140GB Intel X-25 in my old non-unibody Mac. This thing boots so fast I can barely notice it. The only thing I really miss out on is the extended battery life of the newer macs.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#36

I killed my MacBook Air envy by buying a Core i5 MBP, replacing the optical drive with a 128 GB SSD, installing the system and applications to the SSD and symlinking everything big and rarely accessed (iPhoto library, movies, iTunes U, etc) to the HDD. I have AppleScripts that mount/unmount the rotational drive when needed, and my machine now screams . It's heavier, sure, but I don't travel much and I love having all…

Those AppleScripts sound interesting -- mind sharing a link to more info?

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#37
post #2

I own the 13" version. I spent some time testing both at the Apple Store. I really wanted to get the 11" one, but the upper row of keys is significantly thinner. As someone who uses vim all the time, this means missing the esc key very frequently. My advice would be to test both versions as much as you can and see which one works better for you.

You can always type control-[ in lieu of escape.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#38
post #14
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been using the 11" for a couple of months now. I also love it but I am more productive at a real desktop with large screen and large keyboard. I have never seen the apple logo shine through the screen. Take that unit back for a replacement.

i have two of them, and one had its entire display replaced. all three displays show the logo through under certain lighting conditions.

Does the same on my 13 inch - it freaked me out the first time I saw it. Same for everyone else in my office who owns one.

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#39

I killed my MacBook Air envy by buying a Core i5 MBP, replacing the optical drive with a 128 GB SSD, installing the system and applications to the SSD and symlinking everything big and rarely accessed (iPhoto library, movies, iTunes U, etc) to the HDD. I have AppleScripts that mount/unmount the rotational drive when needed, and my machine now screams . It's heavier, sure, but I don't travel much and I love having all…

Those AppleScripts sound interesting -- mind sharing a link to more info?

I, too, would like to see these AppleScripts!

Re: Review of the 11" MacBook Air

#40
People are worried that 128G is not enough for a boot drive!? On my eeepc, I did it in 4G. On my desktop, I did it in 9.8G:

    Filesystem             Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda2               26G  9.8G   15G  41% /
    /dev/sda1              894M   19M  827M   3% /boot
    /dev/mapper/md0_crypt  917G  238G  680G  26% /home
The key is to keep all your movies on an extra drive :P
Post reply on HN