Live data from Hacker News

Norweigan oil fund

nbim.no

151–160 of 339 posts

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

15 years is not UBI. If you can’t rely on it being around for the rest of your life it would be insane to leave your career to live on UBI.

"Leaving your career for UBI" is literally the opposite of what UBI is intended to do.

That's what it's always sold for. Instead of staying in soul crushing jobs in order to survive people could pursue new things and be creative.

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#153
post #54

Yes those social Norwegian's invested; and the UK gave there north sea oil revenues to all the oligarchs

Same thing in Australia, the wealth coming from the resources boom has been and is being given to a few rich people, not the general public (who are having social services slashed regularly)

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is exactly why UBI is generally suggested to give below the poverty line. Enough to survive but not enough to be comfortable. Enough to get you through downturns but not enough where you'll abandon a well paying job.

Which is why i can't fathom why every business would not raise their prices to match the UBI minimum. I mean it's not like there would be anyone who can't afford that.

Because UBI could open their market to more people. If they can make the same profit per person but increase their market size, why raise prices? That prices out more people. In fact this is commonly done now. You sell at a competitive price to expand your market share. It's exactly the tactic of companies like Amazon and Walmart. The problem is if a company has a monopoly and the good is a necessity.

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#155

The Norwegian success is the single biggest piece of evidence as to why the Venezuelan catastrophe was largely avoidable, and the fault of irresponsible leadership.

One piece of history that I think marks the start of Venezuela's free fall, it's the pardon that the then-president Caldera granted to the leader of a military coup, Chávez. That allowed populism and corruption to reign in the country (he won the next elections).

The corruption was there before the military coup. I think the only coup that did not involve prior corruption was the one against Mosaddegh (and still, the country was still corrupted from his predecessor). Also this was probably the coup that finished any hope of peace and democracy in the middle east.

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#156
post #115
post #28

Wow! These people must be extraordinary to use oil money this way! Not kidding! Never been in Norway, but in countries I have ever been this would be barely possible due to corruption and the needs of the politician’s buddies. Like yachts, private jets, Bentleys and Vertu phones. This $186k/person isn’t far from what average German poses: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/617492/cd59713c156ad...

Farouk al-Kasim is the Iraqi who is said to have played a big role in this outcome. I believe his story has been on HN before: https://www.ft.com/content/99680a04-92a0-11de-b63b-00144feab...

And I think Brazil is trying to replicate the model

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#158
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except every other oil dominated country - e.g. Iraq, Libya, half of Africa is more like Venezuela (worse even), than Norway. The oil curse is very real and, for Venezuela, largely unavoidable.

That’s not true, the Saudis do very well for themselves. The entire citizen population is given massive handouts, and it seems to be working out okay. Corruption isn’t very bad, at least compared to other oil states. Also Kuwait is doing good as well, and they have a retarded amount of oil. But, in general, I agree that it often hurts instead of helps. But select countries like the US, Norway, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabi…

>the Saudis do very well for themselves. The entire citizen population is given massive handouts,

Have you ever been to Riyadh and seen the poor state of housing, the laughable state of repair of motor vehicles, the constant complaints about the state of the education and health systems?

Perhaps they are given massive handouts but it doesn't seem to be translating into functioning infrastructure.

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not an order of a magnitude. Even then, so, Venezuela produces 1/5th per capita the oil of Norway. Why doesn't there exist a fund with $37k/person in Venezuela?

You could ask a similar question of the UK.

This is a question I ask.

The UK policy was, effectively, 'paaarty!'

Re: Norweigan oil fund

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps this is why they can afford many government programs that the US simply cannot. Without a prolific income stream comparable to Norwegian oil, the only way to provide more social services is to tax individuals and businesses harder. Tax any group too heavily and you create brain drain, which hurts in the long run.

yeah also take a look at how many immigrants and refugees they let into their country. the number is probably very close to 0.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Norway

> In 2017, Norway's immigrant population consisted of 883,751 people, making up 16.8% of the country's total population. This includes both foreign-born and Norwegian-born with two foreign-born parents, and four foreign-born grandparents. In this population, 724,987 are foreign-born immigrants, while 158,764 are Norwegian-born with foreign-born parents. The ten most common countries of origin of immigrants residing in Norway are Poland (97,196), Lithuania (37,638), Sweden (36,315), Somalia (28,696), Germany (24,601), Iraq (incl.Kurdistan region) (22,493), Syria (20,823), Philippines (20,537), Iran (incl. Kordestan province) (21,364) and Pakistan (19,973). The immigration population comprises people from a total of 221 countries and autonomous regions.

Post reply on HN