Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps this is why they can afford many government programs that the US simply cannot. Without a prolific income stream comparable to Norwegian oil, the only way to provide more social services is to tax individuals and businesses harder. Tax any group too heavily and you create brain drain, which hurts in the long run.
Without advocating taxing any group too heavily, is there any evidence that this practice has ever created a brain drain?
Norweigan oil fund
11–20 of 339 posts
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#12Isn't this contributing to climate change? The economy everyone uses as an example to replace the current system in the US...
Perhaps this is why they can afford many government programs that the US simply cannot. Without a prolific income stream comparable to Norwegian oil, the only way to provide more social services is to tax individuals and businesses harder. Tax any group too heavily and you create brain drain, which hurts in the long run.
An economic analysis in comparison to Finland and Sweden would be interesting.
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#13Isn't this contributing to climate change? The economy everyone uses as an example to replace the current system in the US...
The fund started with oil money, but now focuses new investments on renewable energy sources: https://www.wsj.com/articles/norways-sovereign-wealth-fund-b...
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#14Why fund businesses in other countires? Shouldn't Norway try to set up some more industries at home?
Everyone claim Europe (was: EU) needs more VC funding to stop the brain drain. Well, here is a huge pool of money just waiting to be spent
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#15Re: Norweigan oil fund
#16Isn't this contributing to climate change? The economy everyone uses as an example to replace the current system in the US...
Perhaps this is why they can afford many government programs that the US simply cannot. Without a prolific income stream comparable to Norwegian oil, the only way to provide more social services is to tax individuals and businesses harder. Tax any group too heavily and you create brain drain, which hurts in the long run.
We've had that profit stream, we just let it get captured by private corporations (or in Alaska's case, given away to garner votes).
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#17This blew my mind.
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps this is why they can afford many government programs that the US simply cannot. Without a prolific income stream comparable to Norwegian oil, the only way to provide more social services is to tax individuals and businesses harder. Tax any group too heavily and you create brain drain, which hurts in the long run.
Their income tax is 22% if I'm not mistaken.
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#19> On average, the fund holds 1.4 percent of all of the world’s listed companies. Why fund businesses in other countires? Shouldn't Norway try to set up some more industries at home? Everyone claim Europe (was: EU) needs more VC funding to stop the brain drain. Well, here is a huge pool of money just waiting to be spent
Re: Norweigan oil fund
#20> On average, the fund holds 1.4 percent of all of the world’s listed companies. Why fund businesses in other countires? Shouldn't Norway try to set up some more industries at home? Everyone claim Europe (was: EU) needs more VC funding to stop the brain drain. Well, here is a huge pool of money just waiting to be spent