Live data from Hacker News

IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

wsj.com

351–360 of 416 posts

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#351
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate that people treat currencies as an "investment". In my mind, crypto concurrency is the perfect value-store (like gold used to be), not an appreciating asset. Yet because people treat it like stocks, it behaves like stocks.

I’m not sure there can ever be a perfect value store. Because such a store is a future promise to “look after you”, but the world is so damn unpredictable! Food prices could soar, land prices too, etc. How does the perfect value store keep up or know what will happen? The impression I get is you need to invest in things that are short term risky and long term safeish like stocks to even attempt to store value. If you…

A die-hard indexer would suggest that, if you could, you would want to own uniform (cap-weighted) amounts of every type of asset to ensure getting exactly average performance.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#352
post #332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Federal? No. You defraud someone and it is state, local, or even civil.. unless circumstance (e.g. via mail) makes it a federal offense.

What about if you defraud somebody by pretending to be the IRS?

Probably a federal crime.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#353
post #317

To highlight how nuts this could be: I travel to India every year, and I always carry with me a few hundred USD worth of rupees (the local currency). It would be insane for me to try and track the value of the rupees (in USD) for every time I bought something, and calculate the deltas between that and what I originally gave to the money changer. It is completely impractical to do that, and while I'm not an accountant…

Do it for a few million USD instead of few hundred and the IRS will definitely care.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IANAL, I'm not a tax expert, but I believe you can deduct losses when converting to/from fiat currency (US dollars). Which is where taxation would take effect. If you invested $10k in crypto mining equipment, you can deduct that investment (over 5 years or something similar), you then successfully mine 5 coins. These coins are/were worth whatever exchange rate you could get. Until you use/exchange them, you aren't ta…

> IANAL, I'm not a tax expert, but I believe you can deduct losses when converting to/from fiat currency (US dollars). Which is where taxation would take effect. You are flat out wrong. You are taxed on any income or transaction, no matter the currency used.

IIRC, you don't pay capital gains/taxes while sitting on one share of stock that you haven't exchanged yet.

When you trade it, that's when you get taxed.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IANAL, I'm not a tax expert, but I believe you can deduct losses when converting to/from fiat currency (US dollars). Which is where taxation would take effect. If you invested $10k in crypto mining equipment, you can deduct that investment (over 5 years or something similar), you then successfully mine 5 coins. These coins are/were worth whatever exchange rate you could get. Until you use/exchange them, you aren't ta…

The IRS treats BTC as commodities like stocks, not as foreign currencies. If you mine any coins, that is income you have to pay taxes on. Just like when my RSU stocks vest, I pay (regular income) taxes on the vested amount. It's treated as if my company gave me the money to buy these stocks I now have. Later when I sell them, I'll pay capital gains tax on the gain/loss. Now if I buy coins, then I will only be taxed o…

> The IRS treats BTC [...] like stocks

This is also not correct. Crypto-tokens that are not securities are considered property. As such, they are not subject to wash-sale rules, while stocks are. (Not legal advice.)

Before anyone gets excited, despite being considered property, crypto-tokens are explicitly not eligible for 1031 like-kind exchanges after the latest tax bill (although it's debatable that they were allowed prior.)

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#356
post #317

To highlight how nuts this could be: I travel to India every year, and I always carry with me a few hundred USD worth of rupees (the local currency). It would be insane for me to try and track the value of the rupees (in USD) for every time I bought something, and calculate the deltas between that and what I originally gave to the money changer. It is completely impractical to do that, and while I'm not an accountant…

> It would be insane for me to try and track the value of the rupees (in USD) for every time I bought something, and calculate the deltas between that and what I originally gave to the money changer. It is completely impractical to do that,

It is much more impractical to track the value of fluctuating (maybe x1000 more fluctuations than the USD?) cryptocurrencies though.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#357

> The Coinbase customers whose information was turned over bought, sold, sent or received digital currency worth $20,000 or more between 2013 and 2015. Is that in today's value or at the time?

I believe they valued at time-of-transaction. e.g. if you had no other transactions except for a $100 buy in 2013 that you immediately withdrew to personal cold storage, and then that appreciated to $20k+ today, you shouldn't have been included, assuming they supplied only the minimum amount of info legally required.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> One version of the letter recently uploaded to the IRS website asks recipients who believe they have followed the law to sign a statement... Just a word of advice to anyone who may be receiving letters like this in the future. Do not, under any circumstances, sign a statement that you have followed the law without consulting with qualified counsel first. You should know that every time you sign off on something to…

Exactly. It falls in line with similar to "don't talk to the police". Just keep quiet. This applies to everything when dealing with any government agency. The government is not your friend.

EXACTLY

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem there is that meat doesn't come in dollars; it comes in kilograms. If you are paid in meat, you get something like 100 kg of pre-formed frozen ground beef patties. That doesn't have a dollar value unless you can find a buyer for it. Which is pretty easy to do if it's a commodity. So let's try a more broken example. You get paid in sandstone triangular prisms machined to be 31 mm on the two longer sides, 1…

Whether the unit of measure is kg or bits or unicorns doesn't make a difference since the value at the time of the transaction is what is taxed. Also your example is very convoluted, and with all due respect, I can't tell if it's satire or not.

I'm fairly sure it's not satire. Some people just think that way.

Re: IRS sends warning letters to more than 10k cryptocurrency holders

#360
post #94

> One version of the letter recently uploaded to the IRS website asks recipients who believe they have followed the law to sign a statement Does anyone have a link to the letters? It drives me mad that journalists refuse to link to primary sources.

According to the IRS news release, and posts in r/bitcoin, what they're getting are Letter 6173, Letter 6174 or Letter 6174-A https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-has-begun-sending-letters-t... https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/chupoe/irs_we_have... https://www.irsmind.com/audits/irs-begins-targeting-taxpayer... > Letter 6174– this is a soft notice informing the taxpayer that there is a likelihood that they did n…

The phrasing "requires a response" on Letter 6173 is a bit slippery. To be absolutely clear, if your lawyer thinks you shouldn't send a response, you don't have to. And if it's not already blindingly obvious, literally nobody should even dream of sending in a signed affidavit affirming "under penalty of perjury that they are in compliance with tax laws" without first consulting legal counsel - HN pooh-poohing about the IRS just trying to get its money notwithstanding.
Post reply on HN