Live data from Hacker News

Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

fork.dev

11–20 of 173 posts

Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

#12
Looks nice and clean, although useless for me as a Linux user.

The one thing I use graphical git client for is resolving merge issues, so something lightweight is nice. Currently I just do it in IntelliJ and hope I already have the project opened.

As a side note, I guess the images on the website are fairly small, but they pay for it with tons of jpeg artifacts which does not look clean.

Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

#14
post #12

Looks nice and clean, although useless for me as a Linux user. The one thing I use graphical git client for is resolving merge issues, so something lightweight is nice. Currently I just do it in IntelliJ and hope I already have the project opened. As a side note, I guess the images on the website are fairly small, but they pay for it with tons of jpeg artifacts which does not look clean.

> Looks nice and clean, although useless for me as a Linux user.

That's why Electron GUIs are good. People say they are bloated, but at least the program is available for Linux as well.

Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

#18

Just downloaded it cause SourceTree has been getting slower and more temperamental over time. Seems fantastic and very fast thus far, I'll be testing it more extensively over the coming weeks and might well switch to this. Beautiful work!

Also would love a GitFlow integration like the one you get in SourceTree [1] or Tower [2].

[1] https://blog.sourcetreeapp.com/2012/08/01/smart-branching-wi... [2] https://www.git-tower.com/help/win/integration/git-flow

Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

#19
post #17

Why do merge tools pretend that "their" and "our" or "remote" and "local" are good labels? Can they not show the commit message and hash? Nowadays with history editing often both sides are local and mine.

And then they get misspelled as "their's" and "our's".

Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows

#20
post #17

Why do merge tools pretend that "their" and "our" or "remote" and "local" are good labels? Can they not show the commit message and hash? Nowadays with history editing often both sides are local and mine.

Did you see the screenshots? Looks like it shows the branches at least.
Post reply on HN