What distinguishes it from TortoiseGit on Windows?
Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
11–20 of 173 posts
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#12The one thing I use graphical git client for is resolving merge issues, so something lightweight is nice. Currently I just do it in IntelliJ and hope I already have the project opened.
As a side note, I guess the images on the website are fairly small, but they pay for it with tons of jpeg artifacts which does not look clean.
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#13Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#14Looks nice and clean, although useless for me as a Linux user. The one thing I use graphical git client for is resolving merge issues, so something lightweight is nice. Currently I just do it in IntelliJ and hope I already have the project opened. As a side note, I guess the images on the website are fairly small, but they pay for it with tons of jpeg artifacts which does not look clean.
That's why Electron GUIs are good. People say they are bloated, but at least the program is available for Linux as well.
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#15Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#16What distinguishes it from TortoiseGit on Windows?
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#17Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#18Just downloaded it cause SourceTree has been getting slower and more temperamental over time. Seems fantastic and very fast thus far, I'll be testing it more extensively over the coming weeks and might well switch to this. Beautiful work!
[1] https://blog.sourcetreeapp.com/2012/08/01/smart-branching-wi... [2] https://www.git-tower.com/help/win/integration/git-flow
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#19Why do merge tools pretend that "their" and "our" or "remote" and "local" are good labels? Can they not show the commit message and hash? Nowadays with history editing often both sides are local and mine.
Re: Fork: A fast and friendly Git client for Mac and Windows
#20Why do merge tools pretend that "their" and "our" or "remote" and "local" are good labels? Can they not show the commit message and hash? Nowadays with history editing often both sides are local and mine.