Live data from Hacker News

Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

blog.stephenwolfram.com

31–40 of 81 posts

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#31
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice.

However this post was great.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#32
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

Here is one opinion: http://bactra.org/reviews/wolfram/: A Rare Blend of Monster Raving Egomania and Utter Batshit Insanity

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#33
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

> Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable?

My own belief, based on work I did in the 1980s, is that it’s actually an intrinsic youthful genius phenomenon—analogous to the insufferability one sees in my rule 34 cellular automaton.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#34
"Chaos and Fractals", a huge tome of a book , from the 1990s, is an incredible book to learn about Feigenbaum's work and others. The programming language it uses is rather obsolete, but it's such a wonderful book for a motivated high school or college student.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#35
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

I think he reined it in pretty well for this article, there were a few personal asides but it didn't throw me out of the narrative like it usually does.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#36
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

I have a lot of respect for the man despite his personality problems. He knew what he wanted at a young age and pursued it with determination and persistence and achieved it. Mathematica and the business he built to support it are both great accomplishments. I'm sometimes surprised he's not more popular on HN than he is.

I mention all that so it won't seem too mean-spirited when I repeat this:

I've heard a joke, "Which will achieve self-awareness first, Wolfram or Wolfram Alpha?"

He's a great man, but flawed by too-great appreciation of his own greatness.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#37
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

He’s one of the great minds of his generation but his insecurity complex is so severe that he constantly needs to boast about himself and his achievements to an extent that is unbecoming even in a professional athlete. Tilting his (extremely interesting) book “A New Kind of Science” and saying that it would take a place next to Chemistry and Physics as a discipline is one such example. Even in this eulogy to a dead friend he is content marketing Mathematica’s numerical precision.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

> Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? My own belief, based on work I did in the 1980s, is that it’s actually an intrinsic youthful genius phenomenon—analogous to the insufferability one sees in my rule 34 cellular automaton.

This guy Wolframs.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

I have a lot of respect for the man despite his personality problems. He knew what he wanted at a young age and pursued it with determination and persistence and achieved it. Mathematica and the business he built to support it are both great accomplishments. I'm sometimes surprised he's not more popular on HN than he is. I mention all that so it won't seem too mean-spirited when I repeat this: I've heard a joke, "Whi…

I find his personality fun and charming, possibly only because I've never had to butt heads with him.

Re: Mitchell Feigenbaum (1944–2019), 4.66920160910299067185320382…

#40
post #29

I normally find Stephen Wolfram insufferable (and he still is, in this article) but boy what a privilege it is to have a friend who will eulogize us like this. If I was an intellectual associate of Wolfram’s I’d ask him to write this article for me to read before I died.

Can someone elaborate as to why Wolfram’s insufferable? I’ve only looked at his blog once or twice. However this post was great.

This guy manages to, within three sentences, turn a eulogy into a diss of IEEE floating point calculations, only to boast about how his shitty proprietary math toolbox does arbitrary precision better.

Just one of many grating examples of how he communicates. He's a genius though, so he has that going for him...

Post reply on HN