I can only imagine that there are a number of secondary effects of creating a skewed male/female ratio. Simply put, there are not enough women to go around. I suspect this leads to lots of overly fierce competition for women. Women treated more as precious commodities and less as human beings. Men lacking experience dealing with women. A certain percentage of men being unhappy much of the time because finding a mate…
‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
11–20 of 100 posts
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#12The article doesn't indicate how the villages were sampled. Suppose a village has a birth rate of 8 babies a year (2 babies every 3 months). There's (roughly) a 50% chance the babies will be male and female, 25% chance that they're both female and 25% chance that they're both male. That means that if you're sampling from a district that has 1,000 villages (with the average birth rate of 2 babies / 3 months, roughly t…
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#13Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#14There are nearly 700 villages in the district, and most of them are small enough to have Out of all those villages they just picked the ones which happened to have had no females. It is no coincidence, whoever did the study clearly knew what they were doing and cherry picked the data to sensationalize. You could do the same to any other similar sized district and get the same results.
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#15The article doesn't indicate how the villages were sampled. Suppose a village has a birth rate of 8 babies a year (2 babies every 3 months). There's (roughly) a 50% chance the babies will be male and female, 25% chance that they're both female and 25% chance that they're both male. That means that if you're sampling from a district that has 1,000 villages (with the average birth rate of 2 babies / 3 months, roughly t…
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#16"now new data has revealed that only female children were born in 129 different villages in the same district."
https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/uttarkashis-genderbe...
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#17The article doesn't indicate how the villages were sampled. Suppose a village has a birth rate of 8 babies a year (2 babies every 3 months). There's (roughly) a 50% chance the babies will be male and female, 25% chance that they're both female and 25% chance that they're both male. That means that if you're sampling from a district that has 1,000 villages (with the average birth rate of 2 babies / 3 months, roughly t…
The phrase "in area of India covering 132 villages" seems to imply that it's a compact region, and if that's the case the suspicion of cherry picking would lose foundation.
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#18Wow! I just released a data story on Indian population with a section on "Case of the missing women"[0]. This has profound effects on a society like India, even 2-3 decades later! [0] https://numbersofindia.github.io/stories/population-06-2019/...
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#19Selective abortion is illegal? That’s pretty illiberal of them. Not that I’m surprised I suppose..
Re: ‘No girls born’ for past three months in area of India covering 132 villages
#20That's just mothers exercising their body autonomy rights. Unless it can be shown that they are being forced to abort, I really don't see a problem.