I think it would tell a clearer picture to count the total number of founders and count the percentage of people who were immigrants / 1st gen americans. Then, to give context, you would want to compare this number to the % of people living in the US who are immigrants / 1st gen Americans.
Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
31–40 of 156 posts
Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#32I think there is some bias due to historical events. Ww2 caused a lot of jewish immigrants to emmigrate from europe and some emigrated later from russia. They have been very successful in general. I am sure this particular population already skews the statistics already.
I don't think many of those immigrants would be counted in this study. No founders would be in that group, and very few founders would have parents in that group. Possibly grandparents, but the study is only counting first and second generations.
Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#33I think there is some bias due to historical events. Ww2 caused a lot of jewish immigrants to emmigrate from europe and some emigrated later from russia. They have been very successful in general. I am sure this particular population already skews the statistics already.
I don't think many of those immigrants would be counted in this study. No founders would be in that group, and very few founders would have parents in that group. Possibly grandparents, but the study is only counting first and second generations.
Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#34Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#35Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#36The publisher of this "Study" is from New American Economy, a think tank "fighting for smart federal, state, and local immigration policies that help grow our economy and create jobs for all Americans." So I don't think it is 100% neutral in terms of its view on immigrants.
Serious question: what does a neutral view on immigrants look like? How does one take a view on immigrants without aligning with one side of the debate? You bring up a valid point in identifying the authors of this study. I'm just not sure what a truly neutral position in that debate would look like.
Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think many of those immigrants would be counted in this study. No founders would be in that group, and very few founders would have parents in that group. Possibly grandparents, but the study is only counting first and second generations.
No founders of Fortune 500 companies would be in that group? Why do you say that?
Re: Study: Immigrants and their kids founded 45% of U.S. Fortune 500 companies
#38But it isn't a proof that if the immigrants did not found these companies, someone local wouldn't have found them either. Maybe it had taken some more time but, locals would have ended up setting up these either way. A big maybe. China is an example that screams, immigrants do not matter much for economic success.