They glossed over the “wood is viewed as fire prone” thing and I can’t find the article posted to HN a few months back which discusses it further. The gist was wood protects itself with an insulating layer of charcoal as it starts to burn, and it maintains its strength when heated much better than steel, which starts to bend and cause a cascade failure.
Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#12What is the environmental impact of cutting down trees and constructing so many buildings with wood?
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#13It would be neat if you could plant a seed and it would automatically grow into a house.
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#14Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#15What is the environmental impact of cutting down trees and constructing so many buildings with wood?
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#16What is the environmental impact of cutting down trees and constructing so many buildings with wood?
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#17Modern glulam (glued laminated timber) and cross-laminated timber beams are really good. Formaldehyde emissions are under control. Fire resistance is surprisingly good. Economical and less energy needed for manufacturing.
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#18Note that the Brock Commons mentioned in the article is a bit of a hybrid as the structural core is a pair of concrete stairwells. Norway's Mjøstårnet however (which took the palm from Brock) is structurally fully wooden, concrete is only used as stabiliser for the upper stories (inbetween the upper 7 stories to limit swaying), it's not load-bearing.
Re: Canadian cities take wooden skyscrapers to new heights
#19Anybody knows what the sound insulation are like in these?