Earlier quoted context omitted.
My wife's SSN/credit history/online identities have in the past been mistakenly tied up with her sibling's. This has since been corrected with all the appropriate agencies and organizations. However, from what I've noticed of search results over time, these background check (AND identity verification) sites crawl each other and create a kind of feedback loop, as I've been noticing that some of these pages will falsel…
> These services cause more problems than they solve, and should require consent, oversight, and civil or criminal penalties associated with a failure to meet high quality standards. Existing law does not proscribe recklessly sharing damaging false information about people?
Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
131–140 of 143 posts
Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#132Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#133Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
> These services cause more problems than they solve, and should require consent, oversight, and civil or criminal penalties associated with a failure to meet high quality standards. Existing law does not proscribe recklessly sharing damaging false information about people?
It does not.
Also of note, "Malice would also exist if the acts were done with reckless indifference or deliberate blindness" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_(law)
Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#135Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does not.
According to Wikipedia, it does in the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#United_States Also of note, "Malice would also exist if the acts were done with reckless indifference or deliberate blindness" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_(law)
Re: Detecting Chrome headless, the game goes on
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you name a single for-profit public records scraper who republishes the parsed data scraped without charging for data access? The public records are public. Charging for them is, by the above arguments, immoral. Therefore, not only the municipalities but also the businesses profiting from those public records owe us their scraped data, for free, without regard for profit concerns. Not one for-profit business does…
Loveland (now apparently called Landgrid). https://landgrid.com/