Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not obvious AT ALL. If you’re aware of the “cluster effect” of those with rapid-onset gender dysphoria, you’re aware that being trans is highly influenced by ones social conditions. You’re making an argument that nature is everything when it comes to one’s LGBT status and nurture means nothing, but there’s mountains of evidence to show this is not the case. If you want to tell me that it’s JUST A COINKYDINK that…
"Rapid onset gender dysphoria" is a fake diagnosis made up by transphobes. It's just the latest iteration of trying to divide trans people into the "good ones" and the "bad ones", just like the fake Blanchardian "HSTS/AGP" typology. The fact that you cite it is a strong signal about you, personally. Take queer people at their word or fuck off.
Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
231–240 of 252 posts
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not obvious AT ALL. If you’re aware of the “cluster effect” of those with rapid-onset gender dysphoria, you’re aware that being trans is highly influenced by ones social conditions. You’re making an argument that nature is everything when it comes to one’s LGBT status and nurture means nothing, but there’s mountains of evidence to show this is not the case. If you want to tell me that it’s JUST A COINKYDINK that…
Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar, regardless of how bad the comment you're replying to is. That only makes this place worse. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Your labeling my substantive comments “unsubstantive” is really really weird to me.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
The war on drugs is and has always been racist, it is targeting minorities and filling prisons. How it is precieved is a different thing.
> The war on drugs is and has always been racist, it is targeting minorities and filling prisons. How it is precieved is a different thing. You're missing the point: do today's voters tend to think of it that way? In my opinion, no, they do not. So if you go around arguing that the war on drugs is racist, or exclusively for the benefit of prisons, a lot of people know it isn't racist for them , and that they don't ag…
1- Those that agree with you. 2- Those that don't and won't agree with you no matter what. 3- Those that don't have a well established opinion, yet.
Generally, I know group 1 and 2 are inmaterial. I tend to try and find those in group 3.
If you aren't going to accept that the world is round or other extremely self evident things... there's nothing I can do to make someone see it. Although by pointing out how ridiculous the flat world-ers are (or pro drug prohibitionists), I hope that maybe someone who is considering the flat world theory will see the other side.
Mostly stringent, crazy opinions are the loudest, so we need a sea of reason to counter act them.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
The people who designed the war on drugs, did so with a target. It is to this day blatantly targeting certain communities, for example, sentencing guidelines between crack and cocaine. Your logic is faulty: If you follow your line of thinking making the Kippah illegal would be fine since the 'vast majority of us' wouldn't have any trouble abiding by the new law. Oh, you did put in a condition: as long as enforcement…
As I said, I'm not saying the law is just, I'm saying that most people don't support because they intend to perpetrate your perceived injustice. The vast majority of people are not moustache-twirling villains who think that drug laws should be enforced in the way they are, for the particular purpose of punishing the downtrodden or profiting prisons at any cost; so when your argument revolves around that, the people w…
But to answer you:
> ordinary people are the voters who decide elections
Which is why it is so important that the war on drugs is painted for what it is.
Voters today might not grasp it. But those voters will die off. New generations will come in.
> Ordinary people do the wrong thing because they are wrong
Absolutely! That is why it's important to highlight it is wrong. Even if THEY don't see it. Their children likely will. Some of them will.
The truth has strength.
It's like flat earthers. You don't highlight their inconsistencies to teach them. You highlight it because it is the truth. And the truth shines. People pick up on it... eventually. Slowly. Gradually. It's been happening for thousands of years.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#235I recently read some something that had the following premise: Immigrants leave their family and friends behind. People who are more empathetic have a harder time doing this. Therefore, countries with net emigration will grow more empathetic. Countries with net immigration will grow less. While just anecdotal, this is something that I've confirmed with my experiences. I'll add in that countries which were founded on…
It does not seem right to me. My country is also a small Latin country like Portugal and we have significant emigration - people are not more empathetic, the hard life that makes people leave does not make the others empathetic.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
The phrase "a world without guns" was a rhetorical shortcut to describe a nation where obtaining a firearm is significantly more difficult than in the United States. I was also not talking about rates of suicide or murder, but rather success rates based on the tool/method used.
rather success rates based on the tool/method used. This interpretation doesn't lead us anywhere too. The most popular method to commit suicide world-wide (hanging) has near 100% effectiveness.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using drugs to treat a physical addiction is first and foremost a "coping mechanism" for treating the physical addiction. When a serious alcoholic is puking themselves nearly to death as they try and get sober, they aren't trying to escape some childhood trauma or "stress". They are trying to escape a physical addiction that has already dramatically altered their mind and body and may possibly kill them. You may be c…
If withdrawal symptoms were really the main reason addicts continued to use drugs then relapses would be rare. I recommend reading about the Rat Park experiments: > In another experiment, he forced rats in ordinary lab cages to consume the morphine-laced solution for 57 days without other liquid available to drink. When they moved into Rat Park, they were allowed to choose between the morphine solution and plain wate…
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#238Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#239This story always comes back every year. With some ground knowledge on this, as I worked previously for Portugal Ministry of Health (Regional Subdivision). All this is price, and the programme works because drugs go where the money is, i.e. not Portugal, goes to the UK and Germany. On the other hand, Alcoholism is a massive issue in Portugal, and there is no Government action.
> because drugs go where the money is, i.e. not Portugal, goes to the UK and Germany. What do you mean? Russia is one of the main drug consumers, and that's not where money is.
Re: Portugal’s radical drugs policy is working (2017)
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
rather success rates based on the tool/method used. This interpretation doesn't lead us anywhere too. The most popular method to commit suicide world-wide (hanging) has near 100% effectiveness.
Wow, no, it does not. You're just making things up?