Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#2Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#3Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#4Do these kinds of mission-critical components generally go to the lowest bidder?
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#5> MIT received the first major Apollo contract, the only one awarded to a university, and the only one given without competitive bidding. Do these kinds of mission-critical components generally go to the lowest bidder?
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#6> MIT received the first major Apollo contract, the only one awarded to a university, and the only one given without competitive bidding. Do these kinds of mission-critical components generally go to the lowest bidder?
For something like this, I'm sure there is stringent engineering validation. I know some initial NN research was part of a larger government project of funding research around stabilizing missiles in flight for ICBMs that was not cheap.
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#7Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#8It describes interesting questions that were faced on the project: say, how much control over a lunar module could be given to a computer system, and how much they should rely on human engagement.
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#9> MIT received the first major Apollo contract, the only one awarded to a university, and the only one given without competitive bidding. Do these kinds of mission-critical components generally go to the lowest bidder?
Re: Apollo 11 Had a Hidden Hero: Software
#10> MIT received the first major Apollo contract, the only one awarded to a university, and the only one given without competitive bidding. Do these kinds of mission-critical components generally go to the lowest bidder?