Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 189 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#41
post #7

I can't stand the new reddit. I always browse the site with https://old.reddit.com/ Just replace www with old.

old.reddit.com is okay, but it now requires the temp whitelisting of 2 or sometimes 3 javascript domains. Not just reddit.com like was required in the past. Given that, it's just easier to use the ceddit.com javascript interface to pull from the API and get the actual old reddit experience. But even worse than the redesign is the new corporate culture of censorship. I left after they banned r/gundeals. They're boilin…

I hadn't seen notabug before. Visited the site and this was the current top post (censored by me):

"Should I complain about a nXXXXr cashier braying like a donkey?"

That's not a great first impression...

As a side note, anyone know how to do multiple asterisks on HN? Backslash doesn't seem to work as an escape character.

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#42
Honestly, the new design might be better, but I'll never know, because like you, every single page throws an error.

How can one of the most heavily trafficked sites in the world be so completely broken? I'm not sure. I can certainly summon lots of examples of terrible design that didn't hinder a site's success in the slightest. But I can't think of many sites that succeed despite throwing constant errors.

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#47
post #14

The new design is godawful and unusable, especially without JavaScript. Switching to old.reddit.com is a breath of fresh air. The juxtaposition seems like an ideal case study in how bad modern web design is. I swear it's almost like web designers are trying to make things worse.

>I swear it's almost like web designers are trying to make things worse.

They are, because the business wants you to download the app.

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#48
Unless I missed someone, every single comment (including myself) agrees: the new site is just unusable. It’s awful.

IMHO it’s been broken since they released it and so it makes me think that they won’t fix it so people will switch to the app (or that’s what they might be thinking).

Like many others I use the old design and if they get rid of it then I’ll just skip Reddit entirely.

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#49
post #14

The new design is godawful and unusable, especially without JavaScript. Switching to old.reddit.com is a breath of fresh air. The juxtaposition seems like an ideal case study in how bad modern web design is. I swear it's almost like web designers are trying to make things worse.

>I swear it's almost like web designers are trying to make things worse. They are, because the business wants you to download the app.

Then why provide old.reddit.com?

Re: Ask HN: Is “new” Reddit completely unusable for anyone else?

#50
post #14

The new design is godawful and unusable, especially without JavaScript. Switching to old.reddit.com is a breath of fresh air. The juxtaposition seems like an ideal case study in how bad modern web design is. I swear it's almost like web designers are trying to make things worse.

It’s not the designers’ fault, it’s developers seeing everything as a technology problem rather than a user needs problem (and I’m speaking as a developer). The best solution for any given problem is usually the simplest, at least until you find that you specifically need extra complexity to solve a user need. Unfortunately modern client-side development is fixed in a mindset of developer efficiency above all, which…

> It’s not the designers’ fault, it’s developers seeing everything as a technology problem rather than a user needs problem

Yes, but in a big company developers don't define the product, (product) designers do.

Post reply on HN