First image of particle entanglement
1–10 of 20 posts
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#2I had the BBC as a reference on journalism, but from a quick glance over the headlines at least its website looks like it's lost some decency in that respect.
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#3Re: First image of particle entanglement
#4Well then set up two particles on opposite sides of the planet and send communications via this entanglement at the speed of.. light?
And yes, I have near zero knowledge of particle physics!
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#5> It occurs no matter how great the distance between the particles is. Well then set up two particles on opposite sides of the planet and send communications via this entanglement at the speed of.. light? And yes, I have near zero knowledge of particle physics!
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#6Strange way of throwing Einstein's name into the title for linkbaiting sake. It's not his particle entanglement but John Bell's if anyone's, calling it "spooky" is Einstein's contribution, at least in the context of the article. I had the BBC as a reference on journalism, but from a quick glance over the headlines at least its website looks like it's lost some decency in that respect.
The interaction also seemed incompatible with elements of his special theory of relativity.
Scientist Sir John Bell __later__ formalised the concept ...
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#7> It occurs no matter how great the distance between the particles is. Well then set up two particles on opposite sides of the planet and send communications via this entanglement at the speed of.. light? And yes, I have near zero knowledge of particle physics!
>
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#8> It occurs no matter how great the distance between the particles is. Well then set up two particles on opposite sides of the planet and send communications via this entanglement at the speed of.. light? And yes, I have near zero knowledge of particle physics!
Re: First image of particle entanglement
#9Strange way of throwing Einstein's name into the title for linkbaiting sake. It's not his particle entanglement but John Bell's if anyone's, calling it "spooky" is Einstein's contribution, at least in the context of the article. I had the BBC as a reference on journalism, but from a quick glance over the headlines at least its website looks like it's lost some decency in that respect.