Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it’s a stretch to say using an alias makes it less real or using a ruckenfigur picture takes away from the story. If the law allows for witness protection via alias, I can’t see something less real or genuine. As someone else had pointed out this man may not realize or care about the consequences of the publicity but the author does have a duty to care and I think he betrayed that duty here.
I'm trying to figure this out: What, specifically, is the duty you think he betrayed? It's pretty obviously not the case that authors have a duty to anonymize everybody they write about — I've never even heard a serious argument to that effect. Hessler said he considered whether there was likely to be negative consequences for Sayyid if he was identified in the story, and he didn't see any likelihood of that. There d…
It’s like when writing s story about people on the periphery of society and most writers use pseudonyms for their subjects. It’s good courtesy and good practice.