Live data from Hacker News

Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

sciencemag.org

61–70 of 432 posts

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I'm renting a house in central NC and May-September our power bill skyrockets from AC. The windows are not insulated at all and we have a lot of them. Even the floors, walls, and ceilings leak heat like crazy, you can feel it just putting your hand close to the wall or ceiling. We run AC to get it down to 76F and it's still crazy expensive and using a lot of unnecessary power. We need to encourage insulation, es…

You are probably conflating window insulation with window air leaks. The best windows generally available are R-5 at best on initial installation and degrade over time as The argon leaks. They are also extremely expensive. Not a very good investment. But most energy losses in older buildings are from leaking air not thermal conductance. So upgrading to R-1 but sealed and we'll installed Windows can do a lot without h…

I don't know much about this, but anecdotal info: my apartment (comparable to a 1-floor bungalow with lots of windows) has argon-filled windows, and it cost me around USD$1600 for the window themselves (I didn't change the frames, but my old windows were cheap/scrap).

I heat to 18oC in winter (Montreal) and AC to 24oC in summer. My electricity bill averages USD$40 per month. The windows made a nice difference, and still seem efficient after 10 years.

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#62
How is the battery storage only $0.013 per kWh? Is that a misprint and they meant $0.13 per kWh? Or is there some fancy accounting where they're storing only a small percentage of the total energy output and giving a diluted price with the partial storage cost spread over the total output? Or is it truly possible with massive scale to achieve battery costs this low? I can't see how this adds up without some sleight of hand, as the gigafactory production cost isn't even nearly this low yet?

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#63

> In March, an analysis of more than 7000 global storage projects by Bloomberg New Energy Finance reported that the cost of utility-scale lithium-ion batteries had fallen by 76% since 2012, and by 35% in just the past 18 months, to $187 per MWh. I hate it when they list battery prices this way, it's very misleading. That's the amortized cost of $187 per MWh cycle, not the battery's upfront cost. Assuming 2000 cycles…

They are comparing it with building a new power plant costs for which are calculated similarly for 20-30 year life cycle. Same is for Solar and wind power plants. Many people assume that prices of grid scale solar and wind power are coming down because of technology improvements that is partly true but another reason for the price decreases is that the investors are finding out the calculated life of these is actuall…

The other thing that is happening is that solar wind and battery are naturally working forward through cost-reduction manufacturing S-curve, while fossil fuel plant tech has already hit the mature-flat portion of that curve. Renewables are basically at the point where there are easy & dramatic improvements in cost reduction by "just" volume scale up and financing, while fossil fuel plants have long explored those options and have more or less hit costs that are much more difficult to improve.

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#64
post #18
post #7

$0.02/Kwh for the solar part is pretty good. A reasonable short-term goal: get 100% of US peak air conditioning load south of 37° N on solar. That's the line from the Virginia/North Carolina border west to central California. Peak solar power output and peak air conditioning load line up pretty well, so that doesn't need storage. Storage is more of an issue for wind, which varies about 4:1 over a day over large areas…

There should be also more focus on proper thermal insulation of houses in warm climate, which is something that is not often mentioned. Lots of energy gets lost on AC simply because heat easily enters the houses.

An interesting fact I was told: a typical American apartment uses more electricity on AC than a typical modern apartment in the Persian gulf countries.

Besides the near absence of insulation, a lot has to do with design itself. Prevalence of huge windows or glazed curtainwalls, indoor convection, exposed floor slabs, huge balconies, abundance of complex shapes, and no avoidance of West-East orientation.

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#65
post #62

How is the battery storage only $0.013 per kWh? Is that a misprint and they meant $0.13 per kWh? Or is there some fancy accounting where they're storing only a small percentage of the total energy output and giving a diluted price with the partial storage cost spread over the total output? Or is it truly possible with massive scale to achieve battery costs this low? I can't see how this adds up without some sleight o…

It's the marginal price of storing a kWh of energy. Not the price of the battery capacity itself

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#67
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Definitely. A lot of our houses were built when a/c wasn’t necessary so you actually wanted to let heat in. The average summer high in LA was in the mid 70s during the 1950s. Now it’s in the high 80s and sometimes hits 100+. The house my dad grew up in he no a/c. We had to install it in the 1980s. Now it would be unlivable without. But the thermal profile is terrible. It’s designed to bring heat inside year round.

>> The average summer high in LA was in the mid 70s during the 1950s. Now it’s in the high 80s and sometimes hits 100+. 10 degrees plus in changes over a few decades?

I bet it's due to the heat island effect due to the proliferation of roads and parking lots.

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#68
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been wonder why can't we convert outside heat into indoor cooling naturally, i.e. in Texas can we convert summer heat to AC power in real time for at least each residence house?

As others have said, you can't use ambient outdoor heat to power air conditioning, because of thermodynamics. It's possible to use solar heating to directly power indoor cooling, without converting to electricity as an intermediate step. My rough understanding is that this is potentially more efficient, but it adds mechanical complexity and loses flexibility (since it only really works in direct sunlight). And it's p…

I actually thought about using solar to drive AC

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#69
post #58
post #7

$0.02/Kwh for the solar part is pretty good. A reasonable short-term goal: get 100% of US peak air conditioning load south of 37° N on solar. That's the line from the Virginia/North Carolina border west to central California. Peak solar power output and peak air conditioning load line up pretty well, so that doesn't need storage. Storage is more of an issue for wind, which varies about 4:1 over a day over large areas…

> Peak solar power output and peak air conditioning load line up pretty well, so that doesn't need storage. In general, yes, but if you look for a term called the duck curve which characterizes that frequently the load comes up after peak output, or even after sunset. For coastal CA wind often helps fill that offset as winds frequently come up near sunset, but it's not always a guaranteed thing. So there does need to…

Yeah. I keep an eye on ISO-NE's (New England's grid) real-time charts (so as to reduce my impact on peak load days), and the daily peak load in summer up here is typically 17:30-18:30 or so, not the middle of the day when solar is peaking.

https://www.iso-ne.com/isoexpress/web/charts

Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid

#70
> the cost to decarbonize the U.S. grid alone would be $4.5 trillion

They make this sound like a lot but that strikes me as actually pretty cheap. I don't think that number can be right.

Edit: I mean seriously think. The F-35 has cost us 1.45 trillion dollars so far.

That's roughly 1/3 of the price they're asserting here. Localizing our entire energy dependence has got to have some serious national security benefits. I mean way beyond the simple evolutionary next step of one piece of military equipment.

It seems like every dollar we spend on energy sovereignity is doing like 10 or even 100 times the work 1 dollar of weapons development is doing to secure our country.

Post reply on HN