Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
1–10 of 432 posts
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#2Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#3Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#4So 3.297 cents per kwh. That's on par with large hydro like Tacoma Power Park. I'm getting 11 cents per kwh for my solar currently in the midwest.
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#5Why lithium ion batteries — are they much cheaper to make than new gravitational potential (i.e. hydroelectric) storage systems?
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#6Why lithium ion batteries — are they much cheaper to make than new gravitational potential (i.e. hydroelectric) storage systems?
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#7A reasonable short-term goal: get 100% of US peak air conditioning load south of 37° N on solar. That's the line from the Virginia/North Carolina border west to central California.
Peak solar power output and peak air conditioning load line up pretty well, so that doesn't need storage. Storage is more of an issue for wind, which varies about 4:1 over a day over large areas and doesn't match load at all.
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#8Why lithium ion batteries — are they much cheaper to make than new gravitational potential (i.e. hydroelectric) storage systems?
Re: Giant batteries and cheap solar power are shoving fossil fuels off the grid
#9Why lithium ion batteries — are they much cheaper to make than new gravitational potential (i.e. hydroelectric) storage systems?
Lipo would supply DC power directly from within your neighborhood.