Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
servethehome.com
Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#2Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#3Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#4It is IMHO more likely that it has inferior performance or even more probably a shorter lifetime due to inferior quality of components and/or sub-standard manufacturing.
About the:
>When our reader tried using iPXE, a network booting tool, with the NIC, it failed even though genuine cards work without issue.
knowing how picky PXE and iPXE are, I would like to see some details of the tests performed.
Since the actual reproduction of markings was so poor, and given that the actual PCB traces run differently, it is likely a no-brand or "bulk" item marked as Intel, as an example, have a look at this one:
https://italian.alibaba.com/product-detail/pci-e-pci-express...
It seems a lot like it.
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#5For anyone trying to spot counterfeit products in general, a good place to look is at the FCC logo. On the counterfeit card in the article the FCC logo is wrong. The real logo ends with two concentric circles with a pie-slice out of them forming the "cc" while the counterfeit logo clearly has a different shape.
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#6For anyone trying to spot counterfeit products in general, a good place to look is at the FCC logo. On the counterfeit card in the article the FCC logo is wrong. The real logo ends with two concentric circles with a pie-slice out of them forming the "cc" while the counterfeit logo clearly has a different shape.
Though I can't see an FCC logo in the different article's photos. (I also can't see an FCC logo on the different model of supposedly-Intel quad-gigabit PCIe card of mine I just looked at.)
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#7Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#8Maybe it is just me, but I fail to see any evidence that a counterfeit card is necessarily a security risk. It is IMHO more likely that it has inferior performance or even more probably a shorter lifetime due to inferior quality of components and/or sub-standard manufacturing. About the: >When our reader tried using iPXE, a network booting tool, with the NIC, it failed even though genuine cards work without issue. kn…
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#9Maybe it is just me, but I fail to see any evidence that a counterfeit card is necessarily a security risk. It is IMHO more likely that it has inferior performance or even more probably a shorter lifetime due to inferior quality of components and/or sub-standard manufacturing. About the: >When our reader tried using iPXE, a network booting tool, with the NIC, it failed even though genuine cards work without issue. kn…
Even if it isn't a security risk from a data theft/malicious code standpoint, it could be substandard in quality and be exponentially more likely to fail.
A failure could just be an annoyance, taking Jim Bob's pornoputer off the home network and causing him to be unable to connect to the YouPorns until his nephew can come fix the boobie-box.
A failure however could take down a mission-critical computer in an emergency response center where even minutes could mean the difference in life or death for someone. Substandard components could also result in a fire, perhaps not in a NIC, but larger capacitors in something larger could overvolt and catch fire.
Worse, I've long had the thought that a hostile government could create ICs that effectively brick themselves when they receive a certain command. With a NIC, in theory, you could have the NIC radio home a small packet occasionally to report the IP. With the list of IPs you could very casually probe which of a handful of pre-determine ports are open, you could get tens of thousands, or even millions, of these chips in the wild looking perfectly normal just waiting for a command. Then say as a foreign government you want to launch an attack on the United States, you filter all the IPs in your database by location, which will remove the bulk of the machines in other countries from the list, and you have a bunch of servers in a bunch of countries get segments of the IP list and they start sending the kill signal at the same time (and if you get really crafty you make the compromised hardware actually start a timer before it bricks, so you can get the instruction out to as many as possible before the bricking causes widespread disruption of the internet). If you've waited long enough you'll have your trojan horse IC in businesses, homes, government offices of varying levels. If you manage to get even 100,000 taken offline, you've probably caused enough disruption to impact the NYSE as well as cause a good deal of disruption and mayhem. You may have even taken mission critical systems offline at power generation and transmission facilities. You've caused some economic damage at a minimum and based on how things go down you may have just made it much easier to launch a physical attack, especially if you have already trickled special forces soldiers into the country on tourists visas or via smuggling routes (United States special forces actually train to go into countries ahead of common forces to cause disruption and/or train local resistance) and can cause further disruption by causing mass panic with shootings/bombings/attacking first responders.
There is more to it than "oh someone can spy on my data now".
Re: Identifying Risky Counterfeit Intel Gigabit CT Network Adapters
#10Will official Intel drivers work on a counterfeit card? It seems like Intel would bake some authentication into the drivers and authentic hardware such that the drivers would not work if the card is counterfeit.
Where? Intel sells network chips to OEMs, one of the more shady ones decided to directly clone Intel PCB.