Live data from Hacker News

Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

decrypt.co

11–20 of 28 posts

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#11
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct. That's why we have an established, well worn process for raising funding for your business. You raise from accredited investors by selling the highest-risk equity, then as you become more mature, you raise from bigger, less risk-tolerant entities. Eventually, you're in a position to publish financials regularly, and raise money from a broader audience ("go public"). Your itemized list is why we do it that wa…

Yet letting Uber's bag holders dump their stock on the public was ethically correct? Don't pretend our current system of only letting the rich get richer by banning access to early-stage ventures is the best society can do.

> Don't pretend our current system of only letting the rich get richer by banning access to early-stage ventures is the best society can do.

It's not, but that's not the point. Offering unfettered access to investing with zero regulation is exactly how more of the Bernie Madoff's of the world would exist. You think the rich are getting richer under the current system now? Just imagine the number of grifter's that would get richer by swindling large swathes of common folk.

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct. That's why we have an established, well worn process for raising funding for your business. You raise from accredited investors by selling the highest-risk equity, then as you become more mature, you raise from bigger, less risk-tolerant entities. Eventually, you're in a position to publish financials regularly, and raise money from a broader audience ("go public"). Your itemized list is why we do it that wa…

Yet letting Uber's bag holders dump their stock on the public was ethically correct? Don't pretend our current system of only letting the rich get richer by banning access to early-stage ventures is the best society can do.

> Yet letting Uber's bag holders dump their stock on the public was ethically correct?

No one dumped their stock on the public. They offered to sell it and someone offered to purchase it.

(Granted, "the public" has some ownership because it likely ended up in several funds that people are invested in).

But on an individual transaction level, someone sought to buy it at a price and someone else sought to sell it at that price. What's the problem with that transaction?

That's how every IPO, and to a greater extent - "the market," works.

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can legitimately no longer tell if this is sarcasm or not.

It's become such a meme, it's generally sarcasm.

It’s a meme because so many people say it with a straight face haha

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#17
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct. That's why we have an established, well worn process for raising funding for your business. You raise from accredited investors by selling the highest-risk equity, then as you become more mature, you raise from bigger, less risk-tolerant entities. Eventually, you're in a position to publish financials regularly, and raise money from a broader audience ("go public"). Your itemized list is why we do it that wa…

Yet letting Uber's bag holders dump their stock on the public was ethically correct? Don't pretend our current system of only letting the rich get richer by banning access to early-stage ventures is the best society can do.

They are only able to dump their stock if someone is willing to buy it.

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#19
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet letting Uber's bag holders dump their stock on the public was ethically correct? Don't pretend our current system of only letting the rich get richer by banning access to early-stage ventures is the best society can do.

All of the data necessary for anyone to make an informed purchasing decision about $UBER is available per SEC regulation. It's up to each individual to decide based on that whether or not it represents a good value, and to hit "buy" on their preferred trading platform, and at what price. Nobody was forced to buy $UBER, and nobody was lied to, and if they were, they've got plenty of recourse via the SEC. Everything of…

Thank you for describing our current system to me. I am advocating for a new system that lets people take more risk even if they are not wealthy. There is nothing magical that happens when you make $200k per year, if you make $199,999 per year you are not an idiot that needs the government to protect you from bad investments.

Re: Blockstack’s token offering is historic, but its dance with the SEC is not over

#20
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All of the data necessary for anyone to make an informed purchasing decision about $UBER is available per SEC regulation. It's up to each individual to decide based on that whether or not it represents a good value, and to hit "buy" on their preferred trading platform, and at what price. Nobody was forced to buy $UBER, and nobody was lied to, and if they were, they've got plenty of recourse via the SEC. Everything of…

Thank you for describing our current system to me. I am advocating for a new system that lets people take more risk even if they are not wealthy. There is nothing magical that happens when you make $200k per year, if you make $199,999 per year you are not an idiot that needs the government to protect you from bad investments.

To be clear the system you're asking for exists, it was brought in by Obama as part of the JOBS act. Anyone can buy equity under the JOBS act and the company has far lower documentation requirements. The 'good' companies (in-demand equity) don't do it because they won't want to pollute their cap tables with 'dumb money' and the ones who are okay with that are terrible investments. It's adverse selection. [1]

Getting rich isn't easy and opening up unregulated access to crap securities isn't going to change that.

[1] https://www.finra.org/investors/alerts/crowdfunding-and-jobs...

Post reply on HN