Earlier quoted context omitted.
> comparatively ancient Android 7.0 7.0 is ancient? 5.1, or rather 4.4 is ancient.
The Android ver on my phone is 4.1. Still runs just fine, but then again all I use it for are calls/SMS, so there's little scope to be exploited.
Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
121–130 of 222 posts
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just make it so the batteries are easily replaceable. It's wasteful to buy a brand new phone when all you need is a new battery.
A battery replacement is $79. No one is forcing you to buy a new phone.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
>which extends the life of old phones. Except they were caught purposely throttling older phones with those updates, not exactly what i'd call extending life.
> purposely throttling So that the phones don't randomly shut off because their lithium ion batteries were old. Yes, they should have told people but it wasn't done maliciously.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's easy... make the batteries easily replaceable... oh wait.
You can replace the battery by going to an apple store, giving them $49, and then picking it up a few hours later. That's not a terrific challenge.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment and most replies use "carrier" as shorthand for "carrier and/or manufacturer". This looks funny to me because my carrier is T-Mobile and doesn't add bloatware AFAICT. Using "manufacturer" as the shorthand would make more sense to me.
T-Mobile does add software to phones. Wi-Fi calling requires T-Mobile-specific OS-level modifications. You won't be able to use it on unbranded unlocked phones. It's definitely not bloatware though.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That was an attempt at graceful degradation that wasn’t communicated well. That was nearly outright fraud which went swimmingly well. The big issue wasn't so much the unannouced throttling. It was that Apple knew that a lot of customers had battery issues but misled them (by denying the entire issue) so that they'll buy a new device. Instead, the debate turned on slightly more defencible for Apple. Slightly more de…
Apple has had a battery replacement option for quite a few years. Apple Store employees don't work on commission, so a customer coming in with a battery problem would most likely be offered the battery replacement option before being sold a new phone.
Aside, I'm pretty sure that Apple Stores do care about margin, and so do employees that identify with their business or are encouraged by their managers, but I am not accusing them (the employees) of anything.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google never forbid updating phones... They forbid forking Android.
That's what he said. They didn't forbid it, but they also didn't mandate it be allowed.
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#128Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#129> Google already fixed at least one of the Android exploits used by "Agent Smith," nicknamed Janus, in 2017 but the fix hasn't made its way onto every Android phone. It's a potent reminder that millions of phones around the world are being used without the latest security measures. Because Samsung (or similar) or even more weirdly, Sprint (or similar) just doesn't fucking update our Android versions for months, or ev…
Re: Malicious apps infect 25M Android devices with 'Agent Smith' malware
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is what I love about Apple. They gave the carriers a big middle finger when it comes to the usual bullshit of bloatware, sticking their logos on things or getting in the middle of updates. That’s because they cared about the end user experience. Google was happy to just grab market share at the expense of the users by allowing carriers to continue with their usual shenanigans. For this reason Apple will have my…
> That’s because they cared about the end user experience. I'm sure 100% of any revenue going to Apple and not shared with anyone had nothing to do with that.