Live data from Hacker News

Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

bmj.com

1–10 of 109 posts

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#3
Interesting results... so sugary drinks AND 100% fruit juices are associated with an increase in cancer risks. I guess I'm not surprised at all about the sugary drinks, but fruit juices... maybe.

Artificially sweetened beverages showed no increase.

I guess now we watch for headlines like "Soda Causes Cancer" which is not what this really says.

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#4

Interesting results... so sugary drinks AND 100% fruit juices are associated with an increase in cancer risks. I guess I'm not surprised at all about the sugary drinks, but fruit juices... maybe. Artificially sweetened beverages showed no increase. I guess now we watch for headlines like "Soda Causes Cancer" which is not what this really says.

Fructose is not great for the human body.

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#5
Now that's surprising.

I would have guessed artificial sweeteners would have had more cancerous effects than "natural" sugars, but I guess that's just a logical fallicy where I assume lab synthesized chemicals are automatically worse for your body than plant synthesized chemicals.

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#6
post #5

Now that's surprising. I would have guessed artificial sweeteners would have had more cancerous effects than "natural" sugars, but I guess that's just a logical fallicy where I assume lab synthesized chemicals are automatically worse for your body than plant synthesized chemicals.

There is not enough data in this study to conclude either way about artificial sweeteners

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#7
post #5

Now that's surprising. I would have guessed artificial sweeteners would have had more cancerous effects than "natural" sugars, but I guess that's just a logical fallicy where I assume lab synthesized chemicals are automatically worse for your body than plant synthesized chemicals.

How long have artificial sweeteners been on the market? How many people only drink artificially sweetened drinks?

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#8

Interesting results... so sugary drinks AND 100% fruit juices are associated with an increase in cancer risks. I guess I'm not surprised at all about the sugary drinks, but fruit juices... maybe. Artificially sweetened beverages showed no increase. I guess now we watch for headlines like "Soda Causes Cancer" which is not what this really says.

Aside from naturally occurring micronutrients, fruit juice isn't that different from soda. I'm not a chemist, but I think it's largely just different ratios of sucrose/fructose/glucose.

Re: Sugary drinks and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort

#10

Interesting results... so sugary drinks AND 100% fruit juices are associated with an increase in cancer risks. I guess I'm not surprised at all about the sugary drinks, but fruit juices... maybe. Artificially sweetened beverages showed no increase. I guess now we watch for headlines like "Soda Causes Cancer" which is not what this really says.

Fruit juice and soda are effectively the same to your body. They’re both high-fructose liquids which spike blood sugar and lead to insulin resistance. The only meaningful difference is that a fruit juice probably also includes some vitamins that the soda doesn’t.

Sources: anything published by Dr. Robert Lustig @ UCSF

Post reply on HN