Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
161–170 of 186 posts
Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#162A paid, Mac only app which could fairly easily be implemented as a plugin to any popular text editor... I'm not sure I understand the appeal - what am I missing here, please? :)
This is like comparing Dropbox to "having an FTP account, mounting it locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem". Yes, you could. Or you could use something that's polished and works, with a clean UI and years of real world testing.
It doesn't work on most computers, of course.
Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#163Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#164Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#165I personally use Numi, which is very similar. I like the ability to assign variables and reuse them (and change the value of the variable on the fly, instantly redoing all other calculations). https://numi.io/
Seconded (though I'm tentatively switching to dc[0], reverse polish notation ftw), can anyone who has used both Numi and Soulver point out the differences between the two? They look super similar to me. [0] https://www.computerhope.com/unix/udc.htm
I have written to Numi author about this a few months ago and he replied he wants to add this feature to Numi but I haven’t heard any news about that since. I am not following Numi closely, though.
Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#166Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#167Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#168Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#169I personally use Numi, which is very similar. I like the ability to assign variables and reuse them (and change the value of the variable on the fly, instantly redoing all other calculations). https://numi.io/
There is also Calca on the Mac.
Re: Soulver – Notepad, meet calculator
#170It looks neat but I wish it had physics calculations - I want to be able to write something like 10m * 1000kg * 9.8m/s^2 in kWh and see a correct result
Qalculate! works better for those things: it understands it like you wrote (you have to use "to" instead of "in" for unit conversions though).