Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And Windows does? Control Panel “add and remove programs” usually works? There’s no equivalent on Mac. Yes, dragging the app to the trash is a thing but that leaves behind content in ~/Library/caches, ~/Library/Application Support, and ~/Library/Preferences . It’s been somewhat of an issue with Mac ever since they first put a hard drive on the original ones back in the 80s... Edit: I literally cleared several GB of…
Control Panel “add and remove programs” usually works? All that does is launch the app’s uninstall process. The app is free to leave whatever crap it wants to on your system.
Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
201–210 of 552 posts
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand how a “you’re about to jump out of the app” confirm panel is breaking protocol links. I actually want this behavior for zoom and any other app...
The first time you use that protocol, of course a warning is appropriate. To prompt the user on _every_ external protocol click seems.. hostile to the concept of linking
Edit: Once you consider social sites with user-submitted content, like reddit, it might be best if you’re prompted every time.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
FWIW I am not sure how dragging the .app to the trash would uninstall other things installed by the app. If I drag photoshop to my trash instead of using Adobe’s uninstaller, I’m pretty sure that leaves Creative Cloud junk running on my machine. Now, zoom did mess up by not having a proper uninstaller shipped with their app, I think a lot of other Mac apps do fail at this too though.
Yes, as is, dragging apps to the trash cannot do that. Apple should probably implement an API that allows developers to tell the OS what other stuff should be removed if the app is dragged to the trash. To prevent devs from removing other people's stuff, you could require that the subcomponents need to be cryptographically signed with the same key as the main app bundle. edit: or, even simpler solution (potentially)…
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
FWIW I am not sure how dragging the .app to the trash would uninstall other things installed by the app. If I drag photoshop to my trash instead of using Adobe’s uninstaller, I’m pretty sure that leaves Creative Cloud junk running on my machine. Now, zoom did mess up by not having a proper uninstaller shipped with their app, I think a lot of other Mac apps do fail at this too though.
Yes, as is, dragging apps to the trash cannot do that. Apple should probably implement an API that allows developers to tell the OS what other stuff should be removed if the app is dragged to the trash. To prevent devs from removing other people's stuff, you could require that the subcomponents need to be cryptographically signed with the same key as the main app bundle. edit: or, even simpler solution (potentially)…
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Ma...
Then the system will automatically disable the login item if the app is removed.
Edit: It seems like Zoom was using a login item, but using the "shared file list" API instead of the newer (but still dating back to 10.6) SMLoginItemSetEnabled.
An alternative is to just make your daemon check for itself whether the main app has been removed, and delete itself if so.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Intent doesn’t matter only results. The result is that unless you like for random websites to be able to activate your camera without your permission, it did harm users. It wasn’t a “bug”. They purposefully hacked around a security feature. Do you really think it was a “bug” that it reinstalled itself?
> Intent doesn’t matter only results. Then you should call Chrome a malware because there were vulnerabilities with remote code execution (and there will be similar vulnerabilities), so every website could install anything. But that is absurd. > The result is that unless you like for random websites to be able to activate your camera without your permission, it did harm users. First of all, you need a hard data that…
So would it also be okay for a credit bureau to post all of your information to a website? Would that be okay until it was “exploited in the wild”?
Are you really saying it’s okay to run knowingly insecure software until there are reports of it being exploited?
Only a few years ago every browser supported Java Applets and with Java Applets every website could run arbitrary code on your machine.
Java applets ran in a sandbox.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple only does so when it's also convenient to their bottom line. They provide the Chinese government backdoor access to iMessage, remove VPN apps from their store to enable censorship, and have we all forgotten they are a PRISM partner? These actions seem pretty "evil" to me.
> They provide the Chinese government backdoor access to iMessage No. What gave you this idea? iMessage is end-to-end encrypted. The keys are managed by the devices themselves. There is no facility to backdoor or intercept the messages. Apple acts as a registration server, notifying your devices when a new device signed in as you joins the pool but the devices themselves tell you when this has happened. That’s all cl…
That is only a half-truth. Apple controls the key infrastructure; they may replace your keys with arbitrary ones at the demand, coercion or compromise by any number of bad actors. The software is closed source, making it impossible to verify any actual claims made otherwise. If they truly valued privacy, why not open source iMessage, allow users to verify iMessage keys, hire an independent third party to audit their infrastructure, or all of the above?
Moreover, Apple has moved iCloud infrastructure to Chinese data centers to enable spying on millions of innocent people. They have removed apps from their store which circumvent Chinese censorship. These are truly shameful acts which has appropriately drawn criticism from human rights watch organizations.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/25/apple-moves-icloud-encrypt...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/24/apple-moves-to-store-icloud-...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/technology/china-apple-ce...
https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/06/26/can-appl...
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
A program that surreptitiously reinstalls software when you uninstall it is by definition malware. A piece of software that lets any website activate your camera without your permission is a security vulnerability.
Malware is a software written to harm user. Their purpose was not to harm user, they wanted to make their service more convenient for users. Bugs are bugs, every product have bugs and many products have security bugs. That does not make them malware.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
As nice as that sounds, I think it requires an impossibly perfect prediction of future events. You face ethical decisions whenever you have power or limited resources.
Yeah, I agree, but I think that is just a way of stating that morals are impossible to perfect.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Control Panel “add and remove programs” usually works? All that does is launch the app’s uninstall process. The app is free to leave whatever crap it wants to on your system.
OK but on Mac, dragging the app to the trash doesn’t launch an uninstall process, so it will always leave the crap behind.
Re: Apple has pushed a silent Mac update to remove hidden Zoom web server
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
So the local server is not a regular price of software with a vulnerability, it is now considered malware?
That's Apple's closed garden, even when they allow you to sideload application, they still have the ultimate decision. Of course it's not malware, but probably enough users have vulnerable software which could be remotely exploited, that they decided to blacklist it.