Live data from Hacker News

The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

utcc.utoronto.ca

11–20 of 518 posts

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#11
post #7

Are there any major x11 features that wayland lacks other than remote operation over a network? I think at one point it locked the refresh rate to 60hz, has that been changed?

Universal keybinding and screen capture of any kind. Kind of show stoppers for people who actually use their window manager for managing windows.

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#12
Sway has become one of my favorite pieces of software. The only issue is that Sway or Wayland seems to have trouble implementing an easy to use redshift/nightlight. Based on my research into eye strain and talking to my optometrist I keep redshift on 24/7 and I can’t go back.

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#13
post #3

I'm also a heavy user of an X-only window manager (xmonad). Learning about this makes me wonder if I should start learning how to work with another window manager so I'm not caught off guard when something stops working.

Do you know about Waymonad? It's supposedly Xmonad for Wayland and uses wlroots like sway.

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#14
post #7

Are there any major x11 features that wayland lacks other than remote operation over a network? I think at one point it locked the refresh rate to 60hz, has that been changed?

Universal keybinding and screen capture of any kind. Kind of show stoppers for people who actually use their window manager for managing windows.

I use screen capture and remote operation every day. Are those features planned?

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#15
post #4

So, RedHat decided that they do not want nvidia users anymore? I’d be more than happy to switch to Wayland, but I can’t.

For as long as X is considered to be a reasonable alternative to Wayland, NVidia is unlikely to suffer as a result of its drivers being unable to support Wayland. If Wayland becomes the only practicable option for graphics in Linux, then NVidia is going to be forced to support it to keep their Linux market share.

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#17
post #7

Are there any major x11 features that wayland lacks other than remote operation over a network? I think at one point it locked the refresh rate to 60hz, has that been changed?

Where do we even begin?

Windows managers? Consistent window decorations? Thousands of applications? Consistent performance? Redshift? Global keybindings?

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Universal keybinding and screen capture of any kind. Kind of show stoppers for people who actually use their window manager for managing windows.

I use screen capture and remote operation every day. Are those features planned?

As far as I know not into the wayland protocol itself. The devs have been pretty adamant that wayland is 'just the compositor' and left the rest as an exercise for the community, or the toolkit developers. So for instance there is https://github.com/foss-project/green-recorder but as far as I can tell on wayland it only works for gnome, and requires dbus to work (wat?!).

Re: The death watch for the X Window System has probably started

#19
post #4

So, RedHat decided that they do not want nvidia users anymore? I’d be more than happy to switch to Wayland, but I can’t.

I'm under the impression it's more like NVidia does not want Linux users, or at least has turned some WM developers against them[0].

[0] https://drewdevault.com/2017/10/26/Fuck-you-nvidia.html

Post reply on HN