Live data from Hacker News

VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

vpnpro.com

41–50 of 236 posts

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#41
A bit misleading to me because I read products as softwares but dismissed it because I knew there weren't 97 VPN softwares on the market.

This should say 97 VPN services instead. Just nitpicking but it did made me look twice.

This type of development is not unusual. Web hosting companies have been buying each other up since the 90s.

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#42
post #2

Nearly as disturbing as the number of people who tell me they use free VPNs. It is a bit mind boggling that folks are concerned about something and use a VPN...but choose a free one...

A lot of people I know are using free VPNs to circumvent the state censorship. It has nothing to do with privacy, only with the fact that when you search for something, about 20-80% of links end with "connection timed out" (depends on what you're looking for, obviously). Most of those sites don't have any "ungood" information and are basically just collateral damage.

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would surprise me if they didn't.

and so 97 VPN products may fall under single digit organizations, big one being NSA!

Now you just need to figure out which one owns which and then chain them cross vendor, and hope that "he's connecting to a chinese spy vpn" doesn't put you on any list ;)

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#44
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A browser is just an application with some minimal services provided such as sync, extensions hosting, auto-updates. A VPN on the other hand consists of an application and usually unmetered usage of the company's bandwidth, which costs money.

> A VPN on the other hand consists of an application and usually unmetered usage of the company's bandwidth, which costs money. Precisely. I imagine one of the more popular uses of VPNs is Bittorrent.

Though if you're in the right DCs, that traffic will be mostly internal, I suppose, since VPN providers and seedboxes aren't that spread out (for price and TOS reasons).

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#46
post #2

Nearly as disturbing as the number of people who tell me they use free VPNs. It is a bit mind boggling that folks are concerned about something and use a VPN...but choose a free one...

Or those who think they can use unlimited bandwidth on 5 devices and have all of it decrypted on the other end for just $3 a month, with no string attached.

Why not? You can run your own VPS with unlimited bandwidth on Scaleway for €3/mo and run your own VPN on that, and other stuff

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#47
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe "browser" was too specific. Replace that with an "organization" and that's Mozilla. They make firefox, but they're more than just an application, they're a group of applications developers that are pro privacy.

So what organization with that kind of credibility is offering a free vpn? If Mozilla did, it probably would get the kind of attention and focus you’re suggesting. I just don’t see a lot of companies with a similar vision as Mozilla that are successful.

Cloudflare is going to offer a free VPN

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#48
post #39
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, a more secure and practical alternative to "VPN services" is the Tor network, which externalizes the cost of infrastructure to volunteers and thus reduces the risk inherent with centralized control. While Tor is also not without risk, I really wish more privacy oriented services and software had decentralization as a core tenet of their design.

You trust Tor exit nodes over vpn providers?

Is there any need to trust Tor exit nodes at all?

Re: VPN owners: 97 VPN products run by 23 companies

#49
post #30

This smells fake news by countries not interested in citizens using encrypted communication. I encourage you to checkout the background of the security "main researcher".

What are you trying to imply here? These research findings aren't hard to validate.
Post reply on HN