Live data from Hacker News

Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

techcrunch.com

111–120 of 172 posts

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#111
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would you want this feature knowing that is burning gas that you paid for while idle? Would you be happy about the car releasing toxic gases like CO and NOX while parked?

This comment confuses me. The electric energy isn't free, and depending on the source its possibly emitting the same gases (but hopefully at a lower rate due to efficiency gains). I'm all for EVs but I find these types of comments distracting and underscoring a fundamental misunderstanding

Parent article is about a solar roof, parent comment wishes such a car to keep AC on while parked. Solar roof = no emissions.

Where is the misunderstanding?

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#112
post #109
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The extended range is nice and all, but if somebody makes a car that can run the AC without running/draining the battery while it's parked, even if it's just a little to keep the car interior at 35°C or so, I would, without exaggeration, buy it the day it's released here. Tesla's dog mode does this. Draining the battery isn't really something to worry about; AC uses <300 watts over long periods (turns on and off at…

This definitely makes Teslas more attractive to me. About half the homes on my (short) street have Teslas. I didn't know how little hot weather affected the battery usage. I had mistakenly assumed that A/C would have a greater negative impact on range.

It will on an older Leaf with a smaller battery. In Norway, you might be forced to turn of the heating in winter if traffic gets bad. But with double-digit kWh of battery capacity as a normally-unuser buffer, it won’t be much of a worry, if at all.

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#113

I live in a pretty hot city (My car's outside thermometer showed 48°C yesterday at midday). The extended range is nice and all, but if somebody makes a car that can run the AC without running/draining the battery while it's parked, even if it's just a little to keep the car interior at 35°C or so, I would, without exaggeration, buy it the day it's released here. Hell, I'd consider it even if it would just keep the fa…

Many modern Hybrids run the AC off battery so would it be sufficient to buy a hybrid with an app that can do "remote start" so you can turn on the car an hour before you leave work?

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#114
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment confuses me. The electric energy isn't free, and depending on the source its possibly emitting the same gases (but hopefully at a lower rate due to efficiency gains). I'm all for EVs but I find these types of comments distracting and underscoring a fundamental misunderstanding

Parent article is about a solar roof, parent comment wishes such a car to keep AC on while parked. Solar roof = no emissions. Where is the misunderstanding?

You're right, misunderstanding was on my end

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#115
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The extended range is nice and all, but if somebody makes a car that can run the AC without running/draining the battery while it's parked, even if it's just a little to keep the car interior at 35°C or so, I would, without exaggeration, buy it the day it's released here. Tesla's dog mode does this. Draining the battery isn't really something to worry about; AC uses <300 watts over long periods (turns on and off at…

I'm not sure how true that would be in extremely hot weather, but it is probably the only reason I'm considering a Tesla if it ever comes to my city, my commute is really short so even if it cut 200 miles off the range it'd be worth it for me. Having a car with remote start alleviates the problem a little bit, but I'd rather not run an ICE engine while I'm not in the car for obvious reasons.

Wouldn't chucking a bucket of water over the car with the evaporation help cool the car down quicker initially? Along with least reducing the amount of time needed to run idle for cooling.

Though this would depend upon the humidity, would not work in high humidity and equally work better in low humidity.

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#116
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hybrids are the future for most of the market worldwide. It will take decades to build out the charging infrastructure necessary to support battery electric vehicles. Some industrialized countries will move faster.

I wonder if you can expand on why you think it will take decades to build out the charging infrastructure. I've seen it suggested that technology adoption S curves have been getting faster and faster over the last hundred years. The power grid exists everywhere you'd want to charge a car already. It seems a petty simple job to go the last hundred feet to the parking space. My perception was that the liming factor is…

The moment you consider apartments, it does not. There are few if any apartments to get where you can charge your car. This is an area many overlook, but if you don't own a home, you might not have a good place to charge.

This does not fit when the big mantra around EVs has been "charge at home!" instead of "fueling up" at a station. Even now, the DC charge stations aside from Tesla are not fast enough.

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#117

I live in a pretty hot city (My car's outside thermometer showed 48°C yesterday at midday). The extended range is nice and all, but if somebody makes a car that can run the AC without running/draining the battery while it's parked, even if it's just a little to keep the car interior at 35°C or so, I would, without exaggeration, buy it the day it's released here. Hell, I'd consider it even if it would just keep the fa…

[deleted]

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#118

They are claiming up to 27.7mi per day left in the sun. If true, my 5mi commute each way would be possible without ever charging the vehicle in the summer... That being s said, curious how this holds up to weather (hail, snow, etc) and whether those numbers are accurate.

If true, my 5mi commute each way would be possible without ever charging the vehicle in the summer

If you're interested in reducing environmental impact, a bicycle would also let you do that commute without charging and with much less environmental impact than an EV covered in solar cells... though it may be less pleasant in hail and/or snow.

If you're just interested in saving money for electricity, then I'd be surprised if the extra cost in adding all of those solar cells is cheaper than paying for the electricity.

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#119
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I'd want that in a normal ICE car.

Why would you want this feature knowing that is burning gas that you paid for while idle? Would you be happy about the car releasing toxic gases like CO and NOX while parked?

If the gas-powered car has a solar roof that's not a problem.

Re: Toyota testing improved solar roof for EVs that can charge while driving

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they can bring the cost down on that, for other types of panel manufacturing for non automotive markets, that would be pretty amazing. 22% monocrystalline silicon 156mm cells are a commodity now (such as to build a 60 or 72 cells panel with and sell it under $0.60/watt), but 30 to 34% GaAs cells are incredibly expensive. Until very recently GaAs triple junction cells have been so costly they are only used on satel…

If they can make them as cheap as silicon then obviously people will buy them instead, but it's not clear to me that panel efficiency is a relevant factor in the economics of commercial solar power.

Interestingly it is, but more because of the associated costs. Extra panel efficiency means you need less land, less mounting hardware, and fewer installers for the same power solar farm.
Post reply on HN