Live data from Hacker News

YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

boingboing.net

91–100 of 449 posts

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#91
post #10

Has everyone forgotten that you can easily just host your own website and throw up whatever video content you want there? I can’t imagine creating a ton of educational content and then having it all depend on the whims of a single platform. This is not the end of infosec or hacking videos.

For how many years ? There are awesome YouTube videos that have been there for 10+ years.

Very hard to imagine anyone dedicated enough to host their own stuff that long.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#92

Every news about authoritarian overreach prompts some discussion about the need for decentralization. Yet, decentralization of services is moot if the underlying physical connectivity layer can still be controlled/filtered from a single point. Then there's the matter of discovering decentralized/distributed services. We have literally billions of devices capable of sending and receiving signals, including millions of…

> Do we really need centralized entities to keep our species connected?

Yes, because while the connected future is here, it's not evenly distributed.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#93

So like, no more defcon talks? That’d be enough to make me switch

As far as I can tell, defcon hasn’t gone anywhere and the one security researcher who’s videos were taken down by mistake were promptly put back up once the researcher pointed out the mistake to youtube.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#94
post #42
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>an expressive and genuine platform (Even worse-so than it is now) Yeah it already is hard enough to dig through the sea of YouTube personalities who mimic each other and start up with the YouTube-isms. Nothing is worse when someone you follow stars doing reaction videos, rants... YouTube drama :( I already rarely leave the handful of channels I follow. Too much garbage to dig through.

My fav part is repeatedly getting recommendations for many years old videos when something like a week’s worth of new comments is uploaded every minute ... why youtube why?

Because recommendation engines suuuck.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#95
post #10

Has everyone forgotten that you can easily just host your own website and throw up whatever video content you want there? I can’t imagine creating a ton of educational content and then having it all depend on the whims of a single platform. This is not the end of infosec or hacking videos.

For how many years ? There are awesome YouTube videos that have been there for 10+ years. Very hard to imagine anyone dedicated enough to host their own stuff that long.

Well, I guess we have no choice but assume that a service we don't pay for will host our content for us forever and never ask anything more of us.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#96
post #10

Has everyone forgotten that you can easily just host your own website and throw up whatever video content you want there? I can’t imagine creating a ton of educational content and then having it all depend on the whims of a single platform. This is not the end of infosec or hacking videos.

You certainly can host your own videos, but not for the cost, ease, and exposure YouTube offers.

Cost, ease, and exposure that you don't pay for either.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#97

What's next, cracking and reverse-engineering? Debugging? (Anti-authoritarian) programming ? As usual, Stallman tends to be quite prescient: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html (perhaps more like "right to watch" in this context.)

I always think he’s mostly right, but a little too uncompromising, but then everything he says comes true. I don’t know how he predicted so far ahead at the time, it’s humbling. As a software author working at startups, am I part of the problem? I don’t understand how to make a good living without locking down the code to some extent, with few exceptions (it’s hard to found red hat)

The system that prevents you from making a good living without locking down code is most of the problem. To the extent you support that, you are likely a part of it. No different from most people nowadays I think, myself included.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#98

It's inevitable. In Fahrenheit 451, books start getting banned because every person who ever gets offended starts asking for the thing that offended them to go away and people comply. This is what happens to big targets. It's why it's important to preserve the independent host.

That's an ironic book to reference in this context, since the book had such a dim view towards video.

Re: YouTube's ban on “hacking techniques” threatens to shut down infosec YouTube

#100

What's next, cracking and reverse-engineering? Debugging? (Anti-authoritarian) programming ? As usual, Stallman tends to be quite prescient: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html (perhaps more like "right to watch" in this context.)

When I was 16, back in 1999 I came to basically the same conclusions as Stallman.

I came to that conclusion trying to “fight” a (non-existant) virus that could infect any non-volatile memory onboard.

Since I didn’t actually control (really I mostly didn’t understand) my hardware it’s always seemed natural to me that, for example, the firmware of a hard drive of a networked computer could be compromised.

Since I didn’t control anything, I was at the mercy of those who did. Therefore I was always very hygienic on the internet, for example.

Stallman’s an arrogant self-righteous bastard. But he’s our bastard, damit! And I love him for it.

Post reply on HN