>"China is using technology for the perfection of dictatorship." -Pete Buttigieg, 2020 US presidential candidate PRC may be blazing the trail, but as the tech becomes proved and available, I won't be surprised to see creeping adoption in more "free" countries (especially following crises).
Exactly. People are already used to much more surveillance than they used and this trend just keeps going. Sometimes it's China taking the lead, sometimes the US, sometimes other countries. But they all look at each other and slowly adopt what the other country is doing. I am pretty sure the next generation will never see anything other than complete surveillance by countries or corporations. And for them it will see…
Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
211–220 of 333 posts
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#212Yet another reason not to visit China.
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you explain what's wrong with whataboutism?
[deleted]
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The US ... This style of argument is deflection, and it gets us nowhere. It's very effective in redirecting the focus away from one bad actor and onto another bad actor, though.
"But western countries do x [whataboutism]" is the standard Chinese propaganda response to everything too. A big part of the 50-cent party's job [1] is to promote negative western news stories. [1] https://www.wikiwand.com/en/50_Cent_Party
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#215Yet another reason not to visit China.
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#216So it’s android only?
>Apple devices were not spared scrutiny. Visitors’ iPhones were unlocked and connected via a USB cable to a hand-held device, the journalist said. What the device did could not be determined.
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#217If the US started doing this (scanning phones for islamic terrorism files) to foreigners at the border, would you care? If it was just a scan and no data was harvested? I believe strongly in the right to privacy, but I have to admit, I do not want anyone coming into my country who has beheading videos on their phone. Unless they are a journalist or something, obviously.
You may not know this, but the Constitution guarantees the same rights to foreigners on US soil as it does to US citizens. (This is a pretty basic part of civic education, but civic education in the US these days is terrible.) So, no, I would not be OK with the government violating the Constitution.
But not before they have technically entered..
(and no, this doesn't mean i'm anti immigration)
edit: or pro searching, etc
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#218If the US started doing this (scanning phones for islamic terrorism files) to foreigners at the border, would you care? If it was just a scan and no data was harvested? I believe strongly in the right to privacy, but I have to admit, I do not want anyone coming into my country who has beheading videos on their phone. Unless they are a journalist or something, obviously.
You may not know this, but the Constitution guarantees the same rights to foreigners on US soil as it does to US citizens. (This is a pretty basic part of civic education, but civic education in the US these days is terrible.) So, no, I would not be OK with the government violating the Constitution.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/population.html
It’s also been hypothesized that the “border” could be expanded to include many more. International airports are arguably ports of entry. Native American territories and embassies + consulates are considered foreign soil.
Re: Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm always confused when I hear this about why malware researchers don't obtain a huge trove of malware samples (and/or zero-day exploits) by obtaining some of these "gifts" and then connecting them to honeypot devices. If all you have to do to receive one is travel to China as an employee of a major U.S. company, they must be quite easy to get ahold of.
I imagine the average Joe working at MSFT/AAPL/GOOG/etc. doesn't get such gifts unless they are worth hacking - in which case I imagine the gift-givers would have done their due diligence. Also corporate policies can be pretty specific and strict regarding gifts to eliminate potential conflicts of interests.