Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare Network Performance Issues

cloudflarestatus.com

111–120 of 329 posts

Re: Cloudflare Network Performance Issues

#111
post #90

>We are working to mitigate impact to Internet users in this region. >This incident affects: North America (Ashburn, VA, United States - (IAD), Atlanta, GA, United States - (ATL), Boston, MA, United States - (BOS), Buffalo, NY, United States - (BUF), Calgary, AB, Canada - (YYC), Charlotte, NC, United States - (CLT), Chicago, IL, United States - (ORD), Columbus, OH, United States - (CMH), Dallas, TX, United States - (…

"This incident affects... EVERYONE!" (insert Gary Oldman Screaming GIF here)

Re: Cloudflare Network Performance Issues

#113
post #90

>We are working to mitigate impact to Internet users in this region. >This incident affects: North America (Ashburn, VA, United States - (IAD), Atlanta, GA, United States - (ATL), Boston, MA, United States - (BOS), Buffalo, NY, United States - (BUF), Calgary, AB, Canada - (YYC), Charlotte, NC, United States - (CLT), Chicago, IL, United States - (ORD), Columbus, OH, United States - (CMH), Dallas, TX, United States - (…

I went to post the list in Slack and got a 'too many characters' error...

Re: Cloudflare Network Performance Issues

#119

So what should the ideal redundancy plan be here? If you can't log into the CDN provider and they are down do you you just have a second one ready (and paid for) and then log into your registrar and be ready to switch to that secondary CDN provider in this scenario? Or is there some sort of load balancing / routing solution between CDN's that I don't know about / understand?

If you use Cloudflare nameservers, you have to change to new nameservers, wait for that to propogate, and then wait for clients cached records TTLs to expire. So it will be a major disruption no matter what you do.

If you're using them for TLS certs then it's an even bigger problem unless you have them provisioned elsewhere.

Re: Cloudflare Network Performance Issues

#120

Don't want to go off topic, but if I want to prevent my website going down because of stuff like this in the future, will having back up DNS entries solve the problem? I know DNS will fall back if it can't reach a service, but would a 502 trigger that?

No, dns doesn't work like this, you can't have backup records.

Not necessarily backup records, but you can add multiple A/AAAA records. There is no guaranteed order though.

It is possible to have multiple A/AAAA records pointing to different loadbalancers, but I don't know how browsers would deal with this.

Post reply on HN