A large portion of what reduced inequality was the destruction of wealth during World War II and the fact that the U.S. benefited afterward from being the last standing industrial economy. I seriously doubt that. We shipped essentially all able-bodied men off to war, so much so that we filled a lot of jobs with women. Birth rates were low because the men were physically absent. People were encouraged to grow Victory…
One aspect I haven’t seen much discussion about is that WWII may have acted as a kind of giant social mixer. I mean this in the sense that people who might hardly meet each today were thrown together often more or less as equals. At least within the (ok, very limited) bounds of the race and gender norms of the day. Today a programmer, middle manager or radiographer say can get to middle age without ever really “meeti…
Rising US Inequality: How We Got Here, Where We're Going
121–122 of 122 posts
Re: Rising US Inequality: How We Got Here, Where We're Going
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not what you said before at all, they don't do an inconsistent comparison of real and nominal, which what I thought the problem to be >>" Inevitably, the income will be real income [inflation adjusted] and the prices nominal prices." They don't specify which in the title, but they do in the article. The biggest thing is there is no comparison between nominal and real prices . Acting like the nominal cost of th…
I've seen the exact behavior I described; this was the fastest misleading headline I could find in a quick search. I'll reply on thread next time I see one, which is likely to not happen in the next 24 hours. Hopefully, you'll take an open minded read to see where social and mainstream media accounts are biased for outrage and clicks over information content and will notice these on your own as well.