Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

wired.com

101–110 of 144 posts

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#101
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Engineering has the concept of “fail safe”. It literally means that the failure mode is a safe mode. If the dns of the DRM server can no longer be reached, a fail safe would allow the book to continue to be read.

Wouldn't it be easy to fool such a check?

There could be other solutions that are harder to fake. E.g. a failsafe that an SSL pinned address returns 410 GONE. That’s stupidly cheap to run indefinitely.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#102
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if you wanted to pay me several thousand dollars to re-buy my library on a different platform? Sure, I'd take that deal And what do you do when the media you want isn't available on another platform? In the recent article about the burning of the Universal music archive we learned that less than 11% of recorded music is available online. Anyone who subscribes to a streaming service knows content comes and goes. The o…

>The only way to keep the things you buy is to actually own them. Not continually rent them from one online service after another. Eh, as someone who has owned (and lost or destroyed) a bunch of physical things, my experience is that I have to continually rebuy physical things I use; I mean, records, CDs, books... these all get lost and destroyed in various ways if you carry them around with you and otherwise use the…

This is why copyright should only be granted on things that don't have DRM, or where a system is in place to release the un-limited copies when support of licensed copies ends.

We should allow licensing, but only if the companies allow the benefit of that - perpetual replication allowing goods to never fail - to accrue with the licensees.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#103
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Overdrive ebooks are DRMed (or at least the majority of them are).

Overdrive primarily uses Adobe's DRM system. You can "liberate" the titles with the use of the DeDRM toolset or get the resources directly off their "libby" platform, which simply requires reassembling the assets into an EPUB

I know you can break it, but this is in response to someone asking a question about how to buy DRM-free ebooks.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#104
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or never buy DRM books to start with. I own a Kindle, however I only buy ebooks from stores that offer epub and PDF as well. At max with watermarks.

Any recommendations for such stores? I know of https://www.downpour.com for audio books and I get all my audio books from them since they are DRM-free. Would love to know of such a service for ebooks, but for fiction.

Packt, Manning, O'Reilly

I buy mostly technical e-books.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#105
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or never buy DRM books to start with. I own a Kindle, however I only buy ebooks from stores that offer epub and PDF as well. At max with watermarks.

Any recommendations for such stores? I know of https://www.downpour.com for audio books and I get all my audio books from them since they are DRM-free. Would love to know of such a service for ebooks, but for fiction.

Don’t forget https://www.humblebundle.com/ for frequent book bundles.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#106
post #53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I keep hearing complaints in the US that EU regulations strangle companies, but as a consumer I’m wildly envious. When I vaped, I tried to get a new disposable part in the EU. I had to upgrade my whole mod because the parts on the market in the US were illegal in the EU because they leaked. The US is sold products that force you to buy more “juice” and make messes. And in the EU, the juice flavors must each pass test…

Conversely, the US is far more strict with diesel emissions, while the EU allows for a LOT more loopholes to favor certain companies that prop up certain economies..

The US is to my knowledge far less strict with any emissions, and have very limited emission inspection. Do you have any example of areas where the US are more strict, including inspections that validate the rules?

With regards to diesel vs. gasoline: Where I live, gasoline is 5 times more expensive than it is in the US, so diesel have been favored solely for its efficiency. We consider anything below ~25km/l (or ~60MPG) to be inefficient, and anything below ~20km/l (or ~50MPG) to be terrible, and that has been our standard for close to 20 years. NOX vs. CO2 is always a discussion, but we do our best to burn as little as possible of anything.

We also try to disincentivize owning old cars that are legal by older standards by having taxes on emission technology (e.g. no modern DPF), as well as fuel efficiency.

(Not that I'm fossil-fuel apologetic—I'm going to get an EV as soon as its affordable. Cars are pricey here.)

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#107
post #69

When my grandfather died he left behind a huge library of books. Many were junk, some were gold. I have a bunch of ebooks, I guess no one will ever see them again.

Sounds like we need to go back to the deposit libraries that were part of copyright in the early days.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#108

> Microsoft will refund customers in full for what they paid, plus an extra $25 if they made annotations or mark-ups. Doesn’t seem all that nefarious. Get your money back, order the paperbacks. No DRM issues again.

And if you don't tend to read the books again, you've made out like a bandit.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#110
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The only way to keep the things you buy is to actually own them. Not continually rent them from one online service after another. Eh, as someone who has owned (and lost or destroyed) a bunch of physical things, my experience is that I have to continually rebuy physical things I use; I mean, records, CDs, books... these all get lost and destroyed in various ways if you carry them around with you and otherwise use the…

This is why copyright should only be granted on things that don't have DRM, or where a system is in place to release the un-limited copies when support of licensed copies ends. We should allow licensing, but only if the companies allow the benefit of that - perpetual replication allowing goods to never fail - to accrue with the licensees.

Yeah, the point is to encourage creation; I agree that there should be some requirement that you must distribute a work to keep that copyright.
Post reply on HN