Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

wired.com

51–60 of 144 posts

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#51
post #35
post #28

It’s not the dark side, it’s the designed in primary side. The ability to view drm’d content is almost just an optional side benefit. I still think legislation should require any product sold with a buy/purchase button should be required to continue functioning even if the “product” is shut down.

That’s what’s so infuriating about DRM. Lawyers may argue that we clicked OK to some fine print somewhere, but the product is advertised as something you buy, not something you lease. That’s why I feel like the right of first sale should be legally protected.

Wait you don’t read a hundred pages of small legalese before you spend $1 on a song? Are you crazy? Who would ever skip reading such a document?

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#52
post #44
post #40

It doesn't make sense to me that eBook retailers can claim they're selling licences to view books, instead of the books themselves. If I were to look for 1984 for a kindle, I'd: 1. Search Amazon for "1984 George Orwell" 2. Select the first option (paperback) 3. See the "Format" selector 4. Select the kindle edition 5. Click "Buy with one-click" Notably, between 4 and 5, reading the entire page gives no indication tha…

Did you pick 1984 because ironically it was once wiped from all kindles? https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18am...

Yes, actually. Because that event was referenced in the original article, which made it the last book I had thought about.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#53
post #43
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But did they use the word 'buy' in their online store? Did they list the item as 'book title' instead of 'book title license'? I'm sure there's a "licensed, not sold" line buried somewhere in the EULA, but why would that take precedence over the prominently-displayed "buy"? Is the "buy" a lie? If so, how is a consumer supposed to know which statements are lies and which are not? For all they know, the EULA could be t…

I keep hearing complaints in the US that EU regulations strangle companies, but as a consumer I’m wildly envious. When I vaped, I tried to get a new disposable part in the EU. I had to upgrade my whole mod because the parts on the market in the US were illegal in the EU because they leaked. The US is sold products that force you to buy more “juice” and make messes. And in the EU, the juice flavors must each pass test…

Conversely, the US is far more strict with diesel emissions, while the EU allows for a LOT more loopholes to favor certain companies that prop up certain economies..

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#54
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or never buy DRM books to start with. I own a Kindle, however I only buy ebooks from stores that offer epub and PDF as well. At max with watermarks.

Any recommendations for such stores? I know of https://www.downpour.com for audio books and I get all my audio books from them since they are DRM-free. Would love to know of such a service for ebooks, but for fiction.

It's not the same as buying DRM free, but stripping DRM from most eBook formats is pretty trivial these days, afaik. Unless something has changed in the last few years since I last bought a kindle edition of a book (which I stripped of DRM so something like this couldn't happen).

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#55
post #46

And this is why I only 'buy' eBooks if they're dirt cheap (<$5). Even then if I really enjoy them I'll buy a physical copy.

Agree, but to add to that, I buy ebooks that date quickly. If it is a software reference or investment analysys or something that is dated and irrelevant in 2 or 3 years, I don’t really care if it evaporates. Which I guess is feeding he beast.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#58
post #56

I'm genuinely curious - what is the "light" side of DRM?

Allows businesses to extract greater profits from their existing portfolio

In the end, most of the world's problems can be traced back greed. I suggest to add the word "profit" to the list of synonyms of greed.

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#59
post #47
post #19

I mean, honestly this was clear from the moment online stores with DRM'd media started appearing. If it's not stored on your own device in a DRM free format, it can disappear at any time. It's less 'the dark side of DRM', and more simply that DRM requires actively maintained infrastructure. When the business case isn't there to pay for that anymore (or the company goes bust), then what else can one expect?

Engineering has the concept of “fail safe”. It literally means that the failure mode is a safe mode. If the dns of the DRM server can no longer be reached, a fail safe would allow the book to continue to be read.

Wouldn't it be easy to fool such a check?

Re: Microsoft's eBook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

#60
post #53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I keep hearing complaints in the US that EU regulations strangle companies, but as a consumer I’m wildly envious. When I vaped, I tried to get a new disposable part in the EU. I had to upgrade my whole mod because the parts on the market in the US were illegal in the EU because they leaked. The US is sold products that force you to buy more “juice” and make messes. And in the EU, the juice flavors must each pass test…

Conversely, the US is far more strict with diesel emissions, while the EU allows for a LOT more loopholes to favor certain companies that prop up certain economies..

That's a difference in priority between particulate emissions and CO2 emissions, right? With one favoring a relative reduction in soot and the other favoring a relative reduction in CO2. That's my understanding anyway, I'm not a car guy.
Post reply on HN