Instead of going with an ad-hoc schema, I wish JSON Resume built on top of data structures standardized by Schema.org. They cover most of the concepts required— https://schema.org/Person , https://schema.org/skills , https://pending.schema.org/knowsAbout , the list goes on. For concepts not covered by Schema.org (I spotted only one, “interests”) the project could implement custom extensions until they are adopted by…
I personally don't disagree, we've always thought it best to leverage other peoples work first. Though one of the largest discussions we had on the specification was the definition of what a name was -> https://github.com/jsonresume/resume-schema/issues/4 After everyone's input, we decided to just opt for one field `name` because simply first/last/family name does not work across cultures. When we looked at schema.or…
Maybe if you could find a copy of those specs pity that the ISO and ITU where always so restrictive and dam expensive.