There are government services, such as the USPTO, that rely on Google reCAPTCHA. The new reCAPTCHA has made it difficult for me to access documents, and sometimes they think that I'm a bot and thus deny me access entirely. Does the government realize the consequences of this? Both that it pushes users to use Chromium-based browsers, and that they're helping to solidify a company that already has a near monopoly in th…
Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
211–220 of 566 posts
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#212I guess another question is why we really need captchas. What are we trying to protect against that can't be accomplished with rate limits, voting systems, or other ways to regulate meaningful use of a website? Ultimately why does it matter if the user is a human or bot, as long as they are being a valuable user? What's wrong if a bot buys some of your inventory, pays for it and everything? What's wrong if an NLP bot…
> What's wrong if a bot buys some of your inventory, pays for it and everything? 100% of the time, a bot buying things from a store is doing so to test a database of stolen credit cards the bot's owner has purchased/stolen. Accepting those sales means you'll get hit with chargebacks a few weeks later as the real owners of those cards see their statements. Then your store gets shut down for exceeding the maximum 1% ch…
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#213Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also Google punishes Firefox users by forcing them to click on pictures 2-3 times more than Chrome.
Same with Brave: I'm logged in into a gmail account and a custom domain hosted on gmail, yet every time there's a reCAPTCHA widget on the site, I have to do it 2 or 3 times before I'm let in. One trick that seems to help fool that awful piece of tech: click slowly on the images, as if you were thinking a second or two before each click. Maybe click a wrong image and deselect it again. In other words, behave like a sl…
Again, being slower and more error prone seems to be rewarded.
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#214There are government services, such as the USPTO, that rely on Google reCAPTCHA. The new reCAPTCHA has made it difficult for me to access documents, and sometimes they think that I'm a bot and thus deny me access entirely. Does the government realize the consequences of this? Both that it pushes users to use Chromium-based browsers, and that they're helping to solidify a company that already has a near monopoly in th…
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's even worse when you're running a VPN (especially one of the major public ones). When I see reCAPTCHA I basically give up as sometimes I have to go through 6 or 7 full sets to be let into a site. It's the evil of the internet this.
reCAPTCHA on VPN is difficult, but on the Tor network, they are downright impossible. I've never been able to get past it, even after a few dozen painful attempts. That means Google services are entirely off-limits over Tor, even Search, which is a disgrace.
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#216Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#217I hate the v3 reCAPTCHA. On FF, I usually KNOW I am answering correctly and it says I failed. I always have to go through it multiple times. It's maddening. It often leaves me second guessing myself... is that sliver of car counted? is a crossing signal a street light? What about those streetlights way off in the distance, do I select those two in addition to the ones front and center? That RV looks sort of like a bu…
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#218I'm noticing that little blue bock in the bottom right corner of more sites now and I think I just want to block it entirely. If a site won't let me login because of it, guess I'll just stop using it. If it's something like my Bank .. well guess I gotta get a new bank.
Nothing really excuses this level of potential tracking.
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#219Earlier quoted context omitted.
they have a patent on giving out unbeatable challenges when the computer thinks it's dealing with a 'malicious agent'. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9407661B2/en
That's Juniper, not Google. Juniper patented saying "No" to a client.
Re: Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side
#220Google has been doing the same with reCAPTCHA v2 [1]. They are aware of the legal risk of outright blocking users from accessing services, so reCAPTCHA v3 contains no user facing UI, Google merely makes a suggestion in the form of a user score, so the responsibility to delay or block access and the legal liability that comes with it falls on websites. reCAPTCHA v2 is superseded by v3 because it presents a broader opp…