Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
31–40 of 118 posts
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#32"The fact that the combination was in a specific pattern and did not appear to be a random combination of numbers could also factor into a calculation of the odds, he added." Hehe. I guess he'll have to produce a list of non-random numbers to work those odds out.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox
I suppose the smallest random number is also not random :)
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#33If the combination does allow for wiggle room and the 1 in 8000 figure is correct, the code could have been brute forced in a couple hours. Source: my wife has a habit of forgetting the combination to her 3 digit luggage lock and I had to brute force it a few times (it's surprisingly quick, about 15 minutes) :)
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#34If the combination does allow for wiggle room and the 1 in 8000 figure is correct, the code could have been brute forced in a couple hours. Source: my wife has a habit of forgetting the combination to her 3 digit luggage lock and I had to brute force it a few times (it's surprisingly quick, about 15 minutes) :)
000 start
001 1 move
002 1 move
...
008 1 move
009 1 move
019 1 move
018 1 move
...
011 1 move
010 1 move
020 1 move
021 1 move
...
and so on.Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#35A combination "20 - 40 - 60" on a dial that goes from 1 to 60... Sounds like an equivalent of a factory-default admin/admin login credentials. I wonder if it really was the default combination that the safe was bought with, and the owners never bothered to change it. :)
> A combination "20 - 40 - 60" on a dial that goes from 1 to 60... Sounds like an equivalent of a factory-default admin/admin login credentials. The article explains that it was a common combination for people to use on this type of safe - "Typical combination lock, three times clockwise - 20 - two times counterclockwise - 40 - once clockwise - 60, tried the handle and it went".
"admin", "admin"? Nope.
"admin", "passwd"? Yep!
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#36With all due respect to Mr. Mills, in this context he's a pawn in someone else's master plan.
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#371 in 216000... seems like you could build some robotic device to brute force that pretty easily... or you know, introduce it to a thermic lance. EDIT: sorry, my research suggests that safe-cracking with thermic lances is plausible but not practical (source; Mythbusters, of course)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovqJpcaWD7o
but not with every safe:
"Some modern safe locks are made of lightweight materials such as nylon to inhibit this technique, since most safe exteriors are made of much denser metals"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-cracking#Radiological_met...
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#38If the combination does allow for wiggle room and the 1 in 8000 figure is correct, the code could have been brute forced in a couple hours. Source: my wife has a habit of forgetting the combination to her 3 digit luggage lock and I had to brute force it a few times (it's surprisingly quick, about 15 minutes) :)
The good thing about normal combination locks is that you can try all combinations sequentially with minimum movement. 000 start 001 1 move 002 1 move ... 008 1 move 009 1 move 019 1 move 018 1 move ... 011 1 move 010 1 move 020 1 move 021 1 move ... and so on.
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#39"he noted that some combination locks allow for wiggle-room and if this one had a three-digit leeway, Mr Rosenthal put the chances at 1 in 8,000, "which is still a small chance"." If this is the case, and there have been museum visitors having a go at opening the safe each day... this becomes a non story, right?
Re: Tourist's lucky guess cracks safe code on first try
#40"he noted that some combination locks allow for wiggle-room and if this one had a three-digit leeway, Mr Rosenthal put the chances at 1 in 8,000, "which is still a small chance"." If this is the case, and there have been museum visitors having a go at opening the safe each day... this becomes a non story, right?
It is only open from 1pm to 5pm, May to September, week days only.
Compare with Disneyland for footfall.
A volunteer could have had the time whilst waiting for visitors to give it a go though.