The length of time this type of project takes amazes me.
Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
11–20 of 256 posts
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#12I would assume the most dense medium possible would be a collection of neutrons, since neutron stars are the most dense object other than a black hole, but retrieving information from them doesn’t seem feasible.
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#13Had we found a bunch of silicate glass pebbles in Europa, we'd have considered them a curiosity. After this, we have good reason to find a way to ship it back and have another look.
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#14Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#15What happens at 13.9B years?
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#16Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#17Given that the sun will die in about 5B Years, this is a bit of a gimmick :-D
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#185D and 13.8 billion years? Phony. I know no sane scientist or enigneer that would say they use more than 3D physics. Sounds like catch phrases to sell. With such logic plain old HDD is at least 4D, because it uses CHS coordinates and magnetic orientation, to store data.
To me such communication style undermines the real scine behind it. Do they have nothing better to brag about than excuses to call invention 5D? Why introduce such noise?
Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#19Re: Glass discs that can store 360TB and remain intact for billions of years (2016)
#20"It's been dubbed five-dimensional (5D) digital data because, in addition to the position of the data, the size and orientation are extremely important too"
Orientation is inherently important anyway. Have you ever tried reading a book upside down, and what does size bring? Other than lowering density. And obviously position is important, it's the difference between data and randomness.