Live data from Hacker News

Raspberry Pi 4

raspberrypi.org

681–690 of 859 posts

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#681
post #672

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it really compete with the Jetson Nano? I thought it was designed for AI stuff

Sure, if you're doing CPU-only tasks, Jetson Nano is A57 and Pi4 is A72 which is maybe twice as fast, but if you can offload anything to the GPU at all (media encoding, neural networks, matrix operations) you'll probably get some enormous gains in efficiency with the Nano.

How does the Jetson Nano GPU compare to the RPi 4's VideoCore VI?

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#682

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've been using the RPI2 as my HTPC/NAS at my folks Could you provide some details? The USB-adapted ethernet & lack of wifi sounds limiting for a NAS.

Not OP but... If I would guess hes using OpenMediaVault? It works rather well on even gen 1 pi's.

It might work "well" as long as you don't need a lot of capacity, nor do you care about the fact that everything is running at The existing rpi lines are seriously IO bandwidth constrained in every manner. The USB3 on the 4 hopefully fixes some of this. Bottom line, unless you don't mind your photo's taking minutes to copy, your going to be much better off with pretty much anything else besides a rpi3 as a file server.

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#683

Nice upgrade, I chuckled at the pricing of 1G, 2G, and 4G models as $35, $45, $55 (at least in the US). And that they are pushing it as a desktop. They might start looking like a computer company if they aren't careful. At some point I think they really should consider offering an official case or something :-).

They already do official cases, though for some, this: https://hackaday.com/2019/06/21/grate-design-on-this-cutting...

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#684
post #652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably because it's cheaper than the Cloud Key.

It is, but in my experience the reliability factor is pretty ugly for the rpis. I'd rather either pay directly for the device designed for it, or just run the software on a machine already on the network. Obviously that doesn't work for everyone.

In my experience, anything other than the Cloud Key is quite unreliable. I have been running it on my Win10 desktop without many issues besides the annoyingly restarting after updating.

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#685
post #669

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is an official PoE board that fits the pi 3+ which uses a 4 pin header by the ethernet jack to grab power. The pi 4 appears to have the same header. https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/poe-hat/

How is that Hat $20 when the entire board itself is only $35?

I'd guess primarily the lower volume of the PoE HAT would play a role here. But, it's also a fully isolated power supply with a fan. To me, it looks like this couldn't be made on a fully automated line, so there would need to be manual assembly, which is also more expensive.

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#686

Can't wait to buy this, boot it up, play with it for four hours, then stick it in the same desk drawer with the other Pis I have bought over the years. (The upgrades look great, just my attention span is not so great)

That's why I switched to esp8266, smaller and 1$. Can fit a lot more in the same drawer.

Check out espruino and write the firmware in JS!

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#687
post #579

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any suggestions on microcontrollers? I love my pi but I've been wanting to try my hand at something a little less, desktop-like.

I love the TI launchpads. http://www.ti.com/design-resources/embedded-development/hard... Seems like the number of them has gone way up so if you don't want to waste time thinking about which one to try, here are some suggestions. Cheap and minimal ($10): http://www.ti.com/tool/msp-exp430g2et High spec for things like motor control ($34): http://www.ti.com/tool/LAUNCHXL-F28379D

I would recommend taking the path of least resistance and getting something Arduino compatible. After ignoring it for years, I tried it out last week. It is very easy to use. And the M0- and M4- based boards are very capable.

The Adafruit Trinket M0 was what I needed for a recent project. It's $8 and tiny. The feather boards also look very neat, if you need BLE, the ability to stack peripherals, etc. They all integrate with Arduino so you can be up and running in a minute. (They also support Python running on the device, which is maybe even easier than Arduino.)

Re: Raspberry Pi 4

#689

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You make it sound like they are being unreasonable, but just like USB-Micro to USB-C and X to headphone jack, it's a huge inconvenience when you can't find/don't have it to hand. I used to lose the Micro to C adapters all the time, I lost the C to headphone for my OnePlus6T while travelling and was unable to find a replacement so no headphone use for me. Also, I have about 12 Raspberry Pis, as many display devices, a…

So just have the adapters plugged into the Pi all the time. I mean, what else would you use them for? Problem solved, no drama.

You're not wrong, but it feels like an unnecessary problem to have, stacking a couple of full size HDMI ports would have been nice, or just putting a single port on since having two on a Pi is kinda unnecessary.
Post reply on HN