Live data from Hacker News

Newly recovered Ground Zero photos show why you should back up your CD-Rs now

theverge.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Newly recovered Ground Zero photos show why you should back up your CD-Rs now

#61
post #27

I wonder about this: how do people archive their information, especially photo and video data. I use an array of mirrored HDDs in different locations with everything on it, plus parts of it on a cloud hosting service. It isn't very convenient though and it seems there should be a better solution. How do people in here do it? Most solutions (for me) fall short on quick retrieval and possibility to visually browse phot…

Processed photos and videos: Google Photos and YouTube. As an insider I know that I can't afford to match the availability of those and having the live display copy indestructible is soooo convenient. Downside: I don't think YouTube will give you back verbatim input material. Photos will, but it can be expensive. Raw media material after processing: single local HDD and a remote raid. Home directory: two local time m…

Google Photos is most decidedly not a viable backup for photos and videos.

Google Takeout is broken or flakey, and had been for at least a year. Good luck downloading any archive before it falls with "transfer failed: bad authentication" 30 minutes into the transfer. Of 30 tarballs, only one actually completed successfully. And the images in the tarballs aren't the same bits that I uploaded (via my pixel, so it's supposed to be "original quality," not "high quality").

Pulling your files via the API results in corrupted metadata. Time and GPS location tags are stripped.

YouTube videos are, by design, reencoded with very low bitrates.

Re: Newly recovered Ground Zero photos show why you should back up your CD-Rs now

#62
post #41
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you mind sharing your monthly S3 bill and it’s rate of change?

It's around 10 dollars, but then I have less than 1 TB. I recently starting backing up my RAW files remotely, so this number is set to increase significantly (!) I am very interested in S3 alternatives. I haven't looked at the Amazon Glacier options either, but I suspect the retrieval times make it awkward to query/verify backups.

Thank you. My pleasure and problem is my spouse is a professional photographer ;)
Post reply on HN