Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Nitinol Engines (1992)

free-energy.ws

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 32 posts

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#21

Post by pjc50 »

kybernetikos wrote: post #16
ncmncm wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can make very tiny motors with nitinol, but it is a real waste of the capability of the material. Those work by using electrical resistance to heat a sample, which moves, and then cools off and can be moved back again, such as by a spring. Turning high-grade electrical energy to low-grade heat, thence to motion, wastes most of it (probably ~70%) vs. a magnetic motor that wastes normally less than 10%. But nitinol…

What sort of orders of magnitude are we talking about here? Could you wind a watch with body heat?

You have to find a way of applying and removing the heat in order to make that happen - for watches I would have thought the normal "self winding" kinetic mechanism was best.

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#22

Post by GuB-42 »

wigiv wrote: post #5

I balked at first glance because "free energy," but here we have a unique method for turning thermal into kinetic energy. Slightly outside the bounding box of this energy system, of course, lies the expending of more energy than what's produced to keep the hot water hot and the cold water cold. But using natural low-grade temperature differentials as the author suggests, what might this arrangement achieve that a Sti…

Yes, I wonder why "free energy". It is not free energy, it is a respectable, thermodynamic law abiding machine.

According to what I've seen here, it is good for making tiny engines but the efficiency is low.

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#23

Post by blincoln »

proee wrote: post #17
ncmncm wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where are you getting this? The credible sources I find say they improve with use.

Here is a good article showing thermal and mechanical fatigue. You can see under moderate mechanical stress, it fails between 1e5 and 1e7 cycles. While that sounds like a lot, consider that there are 3e7 seconds in a year. So if you had a mechanical device that operated at 1HZ, it would fail in less than a year. https://www.nitinol.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Pelton-20...

How difficult/expensive is it to recycle the material? i.e. if one had some sort of wonder-generator based on it, would it make sense to use a model where once per year, the owner sends the nitinol pieces back to the manufacturer (who recycles them) in exchange for a discount on replacements?

I assume since titanium is part of the alloy, just discarding it after use is probably not great from a cost perspective.

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#24

Post by greypowerOz »

dirktheman wrote: post #18
imode wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We already have this unique method via Nichrome wire. You can see a really neat application of this in a common toaster here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OfxlSG6q5Y

Technology Connections is my favorite YouTube channel. He's just so good in explaining the technological intricacies of everyday things, and his humor is so wonderfully snarky. I highly recommend turning on the subtitles as well, he puts a lot of effort in them.

"oh, god... he has a third one"

excellent writing and delivery, and yes, usually an easter egg or two in the CC ;)

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#27

Post by Liquix »

proee wrote: post #11

One problem with Nitinol is that it has a limited number of cycles before the material becomes weak and then breaks or no longer returns to its proper state. This is a major limitation on "muscle wires" when using them for products that require a high number of cycles of greater than 100k.

Banks reported no weakness nor degradation in his Nitinol engine after 20,000,000 revolutions. Any idea why there's such a big difference between the numbers reported in each paper?

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#28

Post by andbberger »

tke248 wrote: post #26

Seems like you could make a fan out of this stuff that could be used to vent the heat from air conditioning units instead of using electric fans.

I guess you could... but that would be complicated and expensive and electric fans are pretty efficient anyway.

Re: Nitinol Engines (1992)

#29

Post by Raphmedia »

mojomark wrote: post #10

Application of the subject aside, Nitinol is fun to play arround with. If you want to tinker, this book comes with a coil of Nitnol wire to use in the demos contained in the book: https://www.robotshop.com/en/muscle-wires-sample-kit.html In my experience, challenges of Nitinol (a.k.a. 'muscle wire') for use as a electoactive linear actuator is that if you're not careful you can over heat (or apply too much tensile lo…

There is also a deluxe kit that comes with more wire. 1 meter of each kinds instead of 20cm & 40cm wires.

https://www.robotshop.com/en/muscle-wires-deluxe-kit.html

(Disclaimer: I work at RobotShop in their Web & IT team -- I have nothing to do with marketing though and I'm just a fan of Hacker News.)

Post reply on HN